Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24266674›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2014

MetaboLyzer: a novel statistical workflow for analyzing Postprocessed LC-MS metabolomics data.

Tytus D Mak, Evagelia C Laiakis, Maryam Goudarzi, Albert J Fornace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tytus D MakLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, ‡Biochemistry and Molecular & Cellular Biology Georgetown University Medical Center , New Research Building E504/508 3970 Reservoir Road, NW Washington, DC 20057, United States.
Evagelia C Laiakis
Maryam Goudarzi
Albert J Fornace

Funding

Sample Engineering CoreU19AI067773 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FORNACE, ALBERT J · 2005 to 2024
$105.4M
Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN W BYERS · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
TRAINING GRANT IN TUMOR BIOLOGYT32CA009686 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI ANNA Tate RIEGEL, DAVID J ROBBINS · 1996 to 2026
$10.8M
PA-12-149: Research Supplements to Promote Diversity in Health-Related Research (Admin Supp): Metabolomic biomarkers and instrumentation for assessment of radiation injury,R01AI101798 · NIAID · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI FORNACE, ALBERT J · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS P30CA051008NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009686NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI101798NIAID NIH HHS R01AI101798NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067773NIAID NIH HHS U19AI067773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolomics, the global study of small molecules in a particular system, has in the past few years risen to become a primary -omics platform for the study of metabolic processes. With the ever-increasing pool of quantitative data yielded from metabolomic research, specialized methods and tools with which to analyze and extract meaningful conclusions from these data are becoming more and more crucial. Furthermore, the depth of knowledge and expertise required to undertake a metabolomics oriented study is a daunting obstacle to investigators new to the field. As such, we have created a new statistical analysis workflow, MetaboLyzer, which aims to both simplify analysis for investigators new to metabolomics, as well as provide experienced investigators the flexibility to conduct sophisticated analysis. MetaboLyzer's workflow is specifically tailored to the unique characteristics and idiosyncrasies of postprocessed liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based metabolomic data sets. It utilizes a wide gamut of statistical tests, procedures, and methodologies that belong to classical biostatistics, as well as several novel statistical techniques that we have developed specifically for metabolomics data. Furthermore, MetaboLyzer conducts rapid putative ion identification and putative biologically relevant analysis via incorporation of four major small molecule databases: KEGG, HMDB, Lipid Maps, and BioCyc. MetaboLyzer incorporates these aspects into a comprehensive workflow that outputs easy to understand statistically significant and potentially biologically relevant information in the form of heatmaps, volcano plots, 3D visualization plots, correlation maps, and metabolic pathway hit histograms. For demonstration purposes, a urine metabolomics data set from a previously reported radiobiology study in which samples were collected from mice exposed to γ radiation was analyzed. MetaboLyzer was able to identify 243 statistically significant ions out of a total of 1942. Numerous putative metabolites and pathways were found to be biologically significant from the putative ion identification workflow.

Indexed as

WorkflowAnimalsChromatography, LiquidHumansMass SpectrometryMetabolomicsMiceStatistics as Topic

Identifiers

PMID24266674
PMCPMC3973431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.