Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24265979›Full record

ArticleBacteriophage2013

Bacteriophage K for reduction of

Matthew P Lungren, Diana Christensen, Ravi Kankotia, Irene Falk, Ben E Paxton, Charles Y Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bacteriophage, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevention and Treatment ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Microbes as medicine.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effects ofViruses · 2018
    Article
  11. Nonconventional Therapeutics againstMicrobiology spectrum · 2018
    Article
  12. Staphylococcal Biofilms.Microbiology spectrum · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew P LungrenDepartment of Radiology; Duke University Medical Center; Duke University; Durham, NC USA.
Diana Christensen
Ravi Kankotia
Irene Falk
Ben E Paxton
Charles Y Kim

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this project was to determine whether bacteriophage can reduce bacterial colonization and biofilm formation on central venous catheter material. Twenty silicone discs were inoculated for 24 h with broth culture of Methicillin sensitive

Indexed as

bacteriophage kbiofilmcentral venous cathetersphage therapystaph aureus

Identifiers

PMID24265979
PMCPMC3829956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.