Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24265896›Full record

ArticleInterventional medicine & applied science2013

Red flags in bedside ultrasonography for surgical cases.

Erden Erol Unlüer, Arif Karagöz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional medicine & applied science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erden Erol UnlüerIzmir Katip Çelebi University Atatürk Research and Training Hospital Izmir Turkey.
Arif Karagöz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bedside ultrasonography is highly accurate in evaluating hypotension, even if performed by nonradiologist. Here we report three cases presenting with hypotension to the trauma room. In the first case, limited bedside ultrasonography demonstrated dilatation of the inferior vena cava and loss of respiratory variation in diameter. In further evaluation, dilated aortic root, massive pericardial effusion, collapse of right heart chambers, and a dissection flap at the anterior wall of base of ascending aorta were detected. With these findings, the patient was sent to the operation room with a diagnosis of DeBakey type 2 aortic dissection in approximately 15 min. In the second case, bedside ultrasonography demonstrated absence of pleural movements and comet tail artifacts on the right lung region of the patient. Together with deterioration of the vital signs, the patient was diagnosed as right-sided pneumothorax and underwent the tube thoracostomy. In the third case, bedside ultrasonography revealed the presence of free fluid in Morrison's pouch and splenorenal space in a hypotensive patient with a blunt abdominal trauma. He was consulted with general surgery department and was sent to the operation room without further diagnostic evaluation. In these cases, we emphasized the key role of bedside ultrasonography in hypotensive patients.

Indexed as

bedside ultrasonographyfree fluid in the abdomenhypotensionpericardial effusionpneumothorax

Identifiers

PMID24265896
PMCPMC3831800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.