Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24265615›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2013

Biophysical basis of the sound analog membrane potential that underlies coincidence detection in the barn owl.

Go Ashida, Kazuo Funabiki, Catherine E Carr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Neural Maps of Interaural Time Difference in the American Alligator: A Stable Feature in Modern Archosaurs.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A model of the medial superior olive explains spatiotemporal features of local field potentials.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Go AshidaDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park MD, USA.
Kazuo Funabiki
Catherine E Carr

Funding

CELLULAR MECHANISMS UNDERLYING SOUND LOCALIZATIONR01DC000436 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI CARR, CATHERINE EMILY · 1994 to 2017
$6.1M
CORE--IMAGINGP30DC004664 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MOSS, CYNTHIA F · 2002 to 2012
$3.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC004664NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interaural time difference (ITD), or the difference in timing of a sound wave arriving at the two ears, is a fundamental cue for sound localization. A wide variety of animals have specialized neural circuits dedicated to the computation of ITDs. In the avian auditory brainstem, ITDs are encoded as the spike rates in the coincidence detector neurons of the nucleus laminaris (NL). NL neurons compare the binaural phase-locked inputs from the axons of ipsi- and contralateral nucleus magnocellularis (NM) neurons. Intracellular recordings from the barn owl's NL in vivo showed that tonal stimuli induce oscillations in the membrane potential. Since this oscillatory potential resembled the stimulus sound waveform, it was named the sound analog potential (Funabiki et al., 2011). Previous modeling studies suggested that a convergence of phase-locked spikes from NM leads to an oscillatory membrane potential in NL, but how presynaptic, synaptic, and postsynaptic factors affect the formation of the sound analog potential remains to be investigated. In the accompanying paper, we derive analytical relations between these parameters and the signal and noise components of the oscillation. In this paper, we focus on the effects of the number of presynaptic NM fibers, the mean firing rate of these fibers, their average degree of phase-locking, and the synaptic time scale. Theoretical analyses and numerical simulations show that, provided the total synaptic input is kept constant, changes in the number and spike rate of NM fibers alter the ITD-independent noise whereas the degree of phase-locking is linearly converted to the ITD-dependent signal component of the sound analog potential. The synaptic time constant affects the signal more prominently than the noise, making faster synaptic input more suitable for effective ITD computation.

Indexed as

auditory brainstemoscillationowlperiodic signalsphase-lockingsound localization

Identifiers

PMID24265615
PMCPMC3821004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.