ReviewFrontiers in systems neuroscience2013
Convergent approaches toward the study of multisensory perception.
Review in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Separation of bimodal fMRI responses in mouse somatosensory areas into V1 and non-V1 contributions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A comparison of multisensory features of two auditory cortical areas: primary (A1) and higher-order dorsal zone (DZ).Cerebral cortex communications · 2023Article
- Sensory feedback-dependent coding of arm position in local field potentials of the posterior parietal cortex.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Context-specific modulation of intrinsic coupling modes shapes multisensory processing.Science advances · 2019Article
- Multisensory integration in rodent tactile but not visual thalamus.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Supralinear and Supramodal Integration of Visual and Tactile Signals in Rats: Psychophysics and Neuronal Mechanisms.Neuron · 2018Article
- Developmental time course of peripheral cross-modal sensory interaction of the trigeminal and gustatory systems.Developmental neurobiology · 2016Article
- Intertrial Variability in the Premotor Cortex Accounts for Individual Differences in Peripersonal Space.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015Article
- Deficits in audiovisual speech perception in normal aging emerge at the level of whole-word recognition.Neurobiology of aging · 2015Article
- The construct of the multisensory temporal binding window and its dysregulation in developmental disabilities.Neuropsychologia · 2014Review
- Processing of sub- and supra-second intervals in the primate brain results from the calibration of neuronal oscillators via sensory, motor, and feedback processes.Frontiers in psychology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Classical analytical approaches for examining multisensory processing in individual neurons have relied heavily on changes in mean firing rate to assess the presence and magnitude of multisensory interaction. However, neurophysiological studies within individual sensory systems have illustrated that important sensory and perceptual information is encoded in forms that go beyond these traditional spike-based measures. Here we review analytical tools as they are used within individual sensory systems (auditory, somatosensory, and visual) to advance our understanding of how sensory cues are effectively integrated across modalities (e.g., audiovisual cues facilitating speech processing). Specifically, we discuss how methods used to assess response variability (Fano factor, or FF), local field potentials (LFPs), current source density (CSD), oscillatory coherence, spike synchrony, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) represent particularly promising tools for understanding the neural encoding of multisensory stimulus features. The utility of each approach and how it might optimally be applied toward understanding multisensory processing is placed within the context of exciting new data that is just beginning to be generated. Finally, we address how underlying encoding mechanisms might shape-and be tested alongside with-the known behavioral and perceptual benefits that accompany multisensory processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.