Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24265033›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2013

Assessing racial/ethnic disparities in chemotherapy treatment among breast cancer patients in context of changing treatment guidelines.

Abigail Silva, Garth H Rauscher, Kent Hoskins, Ruta Rao, Carol Estwing Ferrans

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Healthcare Predictors of Information Dissemination About Genetic Risks.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Abigail SilvaCenter of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA, Abigail.Silva@va.gov.
Garth H Rauscher
Kent Hoskins
Ruta Rao
Carol Estwing Ferrans
University of Illinois Chicago · USEdward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital · USRush University Medical Center · US

Funding

UIC CENTERS FOR POPULATION HEALTH AND HEALTH DISPARITIESP50CA106743 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI WARNECKE, RICHARD · 2003 to 2016
$19.3M
UIC CANCER PREVENTION &CONTROL RESEARCH TRAINING GRANTR25CA057699 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI FITZGIBBON, MARIAN L. · 1992 to 2017
$8.2M
NCI NIH HHS 2P50CA106743NCI NIH HHS 5R25 CA057699NCI NIH HHS P50 CA106743NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conflicting study results with regards to racial/ethnic disparities in chemotherapy use among breast cancer patients may be due to the different sample populations, treatment data sources, and treatment eligibility definitions used. This study examined chemotherapy disparity in the context of changing treatment guidelines and explored factors that may help explain treatment differences observed. The data come from a population-based study that included interview and medical record data (including state cancer registry) from non-Hispanic (nH) White, nH Black, and Hispanic breast cancer patients diagnosed in 2005-2008. Logistic regression using model-based standardization was used to estimate age-adjusted risk differences and multivariate analysis was conducted to identify explanatory factors of the differences. Per the 2005/2006 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, minority patients appeared more likely than nH White patients to receive a chemotherapy recommendation (0.87 vs 0.75, p = 0.003). When eligibility was determined per the 2007 guidelines, there was no disparity because under these guidelines, nH White patients were more likely than minority patients to have tumors that no longer required chemotherapy. There was evidence that chemotherapy advances for breast cancer patients are implemented in the clinical setting well ahead of NCCN guidelines. Finally, among eligible patients, chemotherapy recommendation was very high and virtually always accepted and received, with no disparities found at these points of clinical care. The findings suggest that an evaluation of guideline-adherent chemotherapy treatment patterns must carefully consider the definition of treatment eligibility, given ongoing changes in treatment guidelines and early uptake of new diagnostic tools and treatments.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsChicagoEthnicityFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillancePractice Guidelines as TopicRegistries

Identifiers

PMID24265033
PMCPMC3895457
OpenAlexW1966997779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.