Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24263324›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgery2014

A multisite randomized controlled trial of brief intervention to reduce drinking in the trauma care setting: how brief is brief?

Craig Field, Scott Walters, C Nathan Marti, Jina Jun, Michael Foreman, Carlos Brown

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Craig Field*University of Texas at Austin, Health Behavior Research and Training Institute, Austin, TX †University of North Texas Health Science Center, School of Public Health-Behavioral and Community Health, Fort Worth, TX ‡Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX §Trauma Department, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX ¶Trauma Department, University Medical Center Brackenridge, Austin, TX.
Scott Walters
C Nathan Marti
Jina Jun
Michael Foreman
Carlos Brown
Baylor University Medical Center · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center · US

Funding

Multidisciplinary Approach to Reduce Injury and Alcohol UseR01AA015439 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI FIELD, CRAIG A · 2006 to 2010
$2.5M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015439NIAAA NIH HHS R01-AA-015439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDetermine the efficacy of 3 brief intervention strategies that address heavy drinking among injured patients.

backgroundThe content or structure of brief interventions most effective at reducing alcohol misuse after traumatic injury is not known.

methodsInjured patients from 3 trauma centers were screened for heavy drinking and randomly assigned to brief advice (n = 200), brief motivational intervention (BMI) (n = 203), or BMI plus a telephone booster using personalized feedback or BMI + B (n = 193). Among those randomly assigned, 57% met criteria for moderate to severe alcohol problems. The primary drinking outcomes were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months.

resultsCompared with brief advice and BMI, BMI + B showed significant reductions in the number of standard drinks consumed per week at 3 (Δ adjusted means: -1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.99, approximately -1.49, P = 0.01) and 6 months (Δ adjusted means: -1.42, 95% CI: -1.14, approximately -1.76, P = 0.02), percent days of heavy drinking at 6 months (Δ adjusted means: -5.90, 95% CI: -11.40, approximately -0.40, P = 0.04), maximum number of standard drinks consumed in 1 day at 3 (Δ adjusted means: -1.38, 95% CI: -1.18, approximately -1.62, P = 0.003) and 12 months (Δ adjusted means: -1.71, 95% CI: -1.47, approximately -1.99, P = 0.02), and number of standard drinks consumed per drinking day at 3 (Δ adjusted means: -1.49, 95% CI: -1.35, approximately -1.65, P = 0.002) and 6 months (Δ adjusted means: -1.28, 95% CI: -1.17, approximately -1.40, P = 0.01).

conclusionsBrief interventions based on motivational interviewing with a telephone booster using personalized feedback were most effective at achieving reductions in alcohol intake across the 3 trauma centers.

Indexed as

MotivationTrauma CentersAdultAlcohol DrinkingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMotivational InterviewingPsychotherapy, BriefRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID24263324
PMCPMC3984362
OpenAlexW2171927467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.