Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24262016›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2014

Determinants of procedural pain intensity in the intensive care unit. The Europain® study.

Kathleen A Puntillo, Adeline Max, Jean-Francois Timsit, Lucile Vignoud, Gerald Chanques, Gemma Robleda, Ferran Roche-Campo, Jordi Mancebo, Jigeeshu V Divatia, Marcio Soares and 28 more

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 100 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05071352 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Adjuvant Continuous Infusion of Nefopam Versus Standard of Care in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: Randomized Double-blind Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsAnalgesia, Critical Illness, Mechanical Ventilation, SedationArmsNefopam, Standard of care in the ICU for assessment and management of pain, sedation, and delirium.
NCT06113939 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Prevention of Infection of the Respiratory Tract by Applying Methods That Are Non-Invasive for Extraction of Secretions. An Open Label, Randomized, Assessor-blinded Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital San Carlos, MadridRan2026 to 2029Enrolled60ConditionsIntubation Complication, Stroke, Ischemic, Stroke Hemorrhagic, Head TraumaArmsairway clearance, subglottic secretion aspiration, Ceftriaxone 2 grams daily
NCT06901882 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Training in Basic and Assisted Communication Techniques for Intensive Care Nurses: A Quasi-experimental Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BarcelonaRan2019 to 2022Enrolled180ConditionsCritical Illness, Nurse-patient CommunicationArmsCONECTEM, Communication based in BCS (basic communication skills) and AAC ( aumentative alternative communicatiton)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 360 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Pain monitoring in intensive care: How does the nociception level index affect treatment and prognosis? A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors at 20 institutions in 27 countries.

Kathleen A Puntillo1 Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Adeline Max
Jean-Francois Timsit
Lucile Vignoud
Gerald Chanques
Gemma Robleda
Ferran Roche-Campo
Jordi Mancebo
Jigeeshu V Divatia
Marcio Soares
Daniela C Ionescu
Ioana M Grintescu
Irena L Vasiliu
Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore
Katerina Rusinova
Radoslaw Owczuk
Ingrid Egerod
Elizabeth D E Papathanassoglou
Maria Kyranou
Gavin M Joynt
Gastón Burghi
Ross C Freebairn
Kwok M Ho
Anne Kaarlola
Rik T Gerritsen
Jozef Kesecioglu
Miroslav M S Sulaj
Michelle Norrenberg
Dominique D Benoit
Myriam S G Seha
Akram Hennein
Fernando J Periera
Julie S Benbenishty
Fekri Abroug
Andrew Aquilina
Júlia R C Monte
Youzhong An
Elie Azoulay
Hospital de Sant Pau · ESClinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · RODélégation Paris 7 · FRCentro Hospitalar do Porto · PTCharles University · CZChinese University of Hong Kong · HKComenius University Bratislava · SKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKCyprus University of Technology · CYD’Or Institute for Research and Education · BRErasmus Hospital · BEGdańsk Medical University · PLHadassah Medical Center · ILHawke's Bay Hospital · NZHelsinki University Hospital · FIHôpital Albert Michallon · FRHospital Fatuma Bourguiba Monastir · TNHospital Maciel · UYInserm · FRInstituto de Cancerología Las Américas · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleIntensive care unit (ICU) patients undergo several diagnostic and therapeutic procedures every day. The prevalence, intensity, and risk factors of pain related to these procedures are not well known.

objectivesTo assess self-reported procedural pain intensity versus baseline pain, examine pain intensity differences across procedures, and identify risk factors for procedural pain intensity.

methodsProspective, cross-sectional, multicenter, multinational study of pain intensity associated with 12 procedures. Data were obtained from 3,851 patients who underwent 4,812 procedures in 192 ICUs in 28 countries. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsPain intensity on a 0-10 numeric rating scale increased significantly from baseline pain during all procedures (P < 0.001). Chest tube removal, wound drain removal, and arterial line insertion were the three most painful procedures, with median pain scores of 5 (3-7), 4.5 (2-7), and 4 (2-6), respectively. By multivariate analysis, risk factors independently associated with greater procedural pain intensity were the specific procedure; opioid administration specifically for the procedure; preprocedural pain intensity; preprocedural pain distress; intensity of the worst pain on the same day, before the procedure; and procedure not performed by a nurse. A significant ICU effect was observed, with no visible effect of country because of its absorption by the ICU effect. Some of the risk factors became nonsignificant when each procedure was examined separately.

conclusionsKnowledge of risk factors for greater procedural pain intensity identified in this study may help clinicians select interventions that are needed to minimize procedural pain. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01070082).

Indexed as

AgedCatheterization, PeripheralChest TubesCross-Sectional StudiesDevice RemovalDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDrainageFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPainPain MeasurementPrevalenceProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID24262016
OpenAlexW2070208538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.