Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24261608›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

EMPIRICUS micafungin versus placebo during nosocomial sepsis in Candida multi-colonized ICU patients with multiple organ failures: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Jean-François Timsit, Elie Azoulay, Muriel Cornet, Jean-Pierre Gangneux, Vincent Jullien, Aurélien Vésin, Edith Schir, Michel Wolff

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01773876 (Micafungin Versus Placebo in the Nosocomial Sepsis in Patients Multi-colonized With Candida, Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01773876 phase3completednot on this map

Micafungin Versus Placebo in the Nosocomial Sepsis in Patients Multi-colonized With Candida, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2012 to 2015Enrolled260ConditionsInvasive CandidiasisArmsMicafungin, PLACEBO
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults and children.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Management of invasive candidiasis in nonneutropenic ICU patients.Therapeutic advances in infectious disease · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Jean-François TimsitUniversity Grenoble 1, Intensive Care Unit, Albert Michallon Hospital, BP 217, 38043 Grenoble, Cedex 9, France. JFTimsit@chu-grenoble.fr.
Elie Azoulay
Muriel Cornet
Jean-Pierre Gangneux
Vincent Jullien
Aurélien Vésin
Edith Schir
Michel Wolff
Université Grenoble Alpes · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRHôpital Albert Michallon · FRHôpital Saint-Louis · FRInstitut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail · FRUniversité Joseph Fourier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe potential interest of antifungal treatment of non-immunocompromized patients with sepsis, extra-digestive Candida colonization and multiple organ failure is unknown. It represents three-quarters of antifungals prescribed in Intensive Care Units. It may allow early treatment of invasive fungal infection in the incubation phase but expose patients to unnecessary antifungal treatments with subsequent cost and fungal selection pressure. As early diagnostic tests for invasive candidiasis are still considered to be insufficient, the potential interest in this strategy needs to be demonstrated.

methodsThis prospective multicenter, double blind, randomized-controlled trial is conducted in 23 French Intensive Care Units. All adult patients, mechanically ventilated for more than four days with sepsis of unknown origin and with at least one extradigestive fungal colonization site and multiple organ failure are eligible for randomization. Patients with proven invasive candidiasis are not included. After a complete mycological screening, patients are allocated to receive micafungin 100 mg intravenously once a day or placebo for 14 days. We plan to enroll 260 patients. The main objective is to demonstrate that micafungin increases survival of patients without invasive candidiasis at day 28 as compared to placebo. Other outcomes include day 28 and 90 survival and organ failure evolution. Additionally, pharmacokinetics of micafungin in enrolled patients will be measured and evolution of fungal biomarkers and susceptibility profiles of infecting fungi will also be followed. DISCUSSION: This study will help to provide guidelines for treating non-immunocompromized patients with fungal colonization multiple organ failure and sepsis of unknown origin.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov number NCT01773876.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsAntifungal AgentsCandidemiaCross InfectionDouble-Blind MethodEchinocandinsHumansIntensive Care UnitsLipopeptidesMicafunginMultiple Organ FailureProspective StudiesAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsLipopeptidesMicafungin

Identifiers

PMID24261608
PMCPMC4222830
OpenAlexW2106858657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.