Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24261605›Full record

Trial reportBMC neurology2013

Anti-dementia drugs and changes in gait: a pre-post quasi-experimental pilot study.

Olivier Beauchet, Cyrille P Launay, Gazan Allali, Gilles Watfa, Karim Gallouj, François R Herrmann, Cédric Annweiler

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01315704 (Maladie d'Alzheimer et Maladies apparentées), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01315704 unknown statusnot on this map

Maladie d'Alzheimer et Maladies apparentées : Caractérisation Des Anomalies Cognitivo-motrices, et Des Effets Des médicaments Anti-démence et de la Vitamine D à Partir de la Mise en Place d'Une Base de données au CMRR du CHU d'Angers

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AngersRan2009 to 2017Enrolled700ConditionsAlzheimer's Disease, Gait Apraxia, Impaired CognitionArmsDrug intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Management of Gait Changes and Fall Risk in MCI and Dementia.Current treatment options in neurology · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Olivier BeauchetDepartment of Neuroscience, Division of Geriatric Medicine, UPRES EA 4638, UNAM, Angers University Hospital, 49933 Angers cedex 9, France. olbeauchet@chu-angers.fr.
Cyrille P Launay
Gazan Allali
Gilles Watfa
Karim Gallouj
François R Herrmann
Cédric Annweiler
Université d'Angers · FRUniversity of Geneva · CHCentre Hospitalier de Tourcoing · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnti-dementia drugs may improve gait performance. No comparison between acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (CEIs) and memantine-related changes in gait variability has been reported. The objectives of this study were to 1) quantify and compare the mean values and coefficients of variation (CoV) of stride time in demented patients with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders (ADRD) before and after the use of CEIs or memantine, and in age- and gender-matched controls patients with ADRD using no anti-dementia drugs; and 2) to determine whether changes in CoV of stride time differed between CEIs or memantine.

methodsA total of 120 demented patients with mild-to-moderate ADRD were prospectively included in this pre-post quasi-experimental study with two intervention groups (43 patients taking CEIs, and 41 taking memantine) and a control group (36 age- and gender matched patients without any anti-dementia drugs). CoV of stride time and walking speed were measured with GAITRite® system while usual walking at steady state. Age, gender, number of drugs daily taken, use of psychoactive drugs, body mass index and time between the two visits were also recorded.

resultsThere was no difference between groups for the time between baseline and follow-up assessments (232.9 ± 103.7 days for patients without anti-dementia drugs, 220.0 ± 67.5 days for patients with CEIs, 186.7 ± 96.2 days for patients with memantine, P = 0.062). Patients with memantine had a lower (i.e., better) CoV of stride time at follow-up assessment compared to those with CEIs (4.2 ± 2.4% versus 5.8 ± 4.2%, P = 0.010). Patients with memantine had a greater decrease in CoV of stride time compared to those with CEIs (-1.90% versus 0.93%, P = 0.010) and mixed-effects linear regressions showed that this decrease was specifically explained by memantine (P = 0.028).

conclusionsOur results showed that patients with ADRD and treated with memantine, but not those with CEIs, decreased their gait variability, and thus improved their gait safety (Trial registration number: NCT01315704).

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseCholinesterase InhibitorsDementiaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGaitHumansMaleMemantinePilot ProjectsProspective StudiesCholinesterase InhibitorsMemantine

Identifiers

PMID24261605
PMCPMC3898226
OpenAlexW2119705863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.