Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24260603›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2013

Effects of different inhaled oxygen concentration and end-expiratory positive pressure on Pa-etCO2 in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery.

Guiqi Geng, Jingyi Hu, Shaoqiang Huang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guiqi GengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, China.
Jingyi Hu
Shaoqiang Huang
Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThere is some disagreement about whether the PetCO2 is reliable in predicting the PaCO2 in laparoscopic procedures with CO2 inflation. The aim of the present study is to measure the Pa-etCO2 differences over time in healthy patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery with different ventilation methods.

methodsAfter intubation, patients were randomized into three groups. The patients in group A were ventilated with air/O2 (FiO2 = 50%) and supplied with PEEP (5cmH2O). The patients in group B were ventilated with 50% oxygen while the patients in group C were ventilated with 100% oxygen. All patients were conducted with volume-controlled ventilation. PetCO2 and PaCO2 were measured at baseline, one minute after intubation, every 30 min thereafter and 5 minutes after deflation of pneumoperitoneum.

resultsThe differences in Pa-etCO2 between groups A, B and C were insignificant one minute after intubation. The Pa-etCO2 in group B and C significantly increased compared with that in group A at other time points after intubation.

conclusionOxygen concentration and positive end-expiratory pressure could affect Pa-etCO2 in laparoscopic surgery patients.

Indexed as

FiO2laparoscopic surgeryPaCO2PEEPPetCO2

Identifiers

PMID24260603
PMCPMC3832334
OpenAlexW1537554853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.