ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2013
Study of drug resistance and molecular typing of 59 cholerae01 clinical isolates from 1984 to 2002 in Chongqing, China.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the correlation between drug resistance and Cholerae01 clinical isolates from 1984 to 2002 in Chongqing, China.
methodsK-B assay was applied to detect the sensitivity of 59 Cholerae01 clinical isolates (20 Ogawa, 39 Inaba) to 16 kinds of antibiotics. BioNumerics software was used for a cluster analysis of electrophoresis patterns obtained from the Not I enzyme-cutting genomic DNA by Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).
resultsVibrio cholerae01 in Chongqing area, China were highly resistant to Cotrimoxazole, Furazolidone and Streptomycin. The resistance rates were 28.81% (17/59), 61.02% (36/59) and 30.51% (18/59), respectively. While the isolates from the crowd were sensitive to Amikacin, Gentamicin, Tobramycin, Ampicillin, Neomycin and Doxycycline, and no drug-resistant strains were observed.
conclusionNo significant changes are found in the drug resistance of Vibrio cholerae01 from the crowd in Chongqing, China and the drug resistances of the Ogawa and the Inaba strains are different. Vibrio cholerae01 from the crowd in Chongqing, China are highly homologous, which may be from the epidemic strains with the same source.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24260599PMC3832330W132411816What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.