Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24260507›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Macrophage polarisation: an immunohistochemical approach for identifying M1 and M2 macrophages.

Mário Henrique M Barros, Franziska Hauck, Johannes H Dreyer, Bettina Kempkes, Gerald Niedobitek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 347 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
347citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

347 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 604 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Extraocular silicone oil deposition: a clinicopathologic case series.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

287 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mário Henrique M BarrosInstitute for Pathology, Unfallkrankenhaus, Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Franziska Hauck
Johannes H Dreyer
Bettina Kempkes
Gerald Niedobitek
Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DESana Klinikum Lichtenberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophage polarization is increasingly recognised as an important pathogenetic factor in inflammatory and neoplastic diseases. Proinflammatory M1 macrophages promote T helper (Th) 1 responses and show tumoricidal activity. M2 macrophages contribute to tissue repair and promote Th2 responses. CD68 and CD163 are used to identify macrophages in tissue sections. However, characterisation of polarised macrophages in situ has remained difficult. Macrophage polarisation is regulated by transcription factors, pSTAT1 and RBP-J for M1, and CMAF for M2. We reasoned that double-labelling immunohistochemistry for the detection of macrophage markers together with transcription factors may be suitable to characterise macrophage polarisation in situ. To test this hypothesis, we have studied conditions associated with Th1- and Th2-predominant immune responses: infectious mononucleosis and Crohn's disease for Th1 and allergic nasal polyps, oxyuriasis, wound healing and foreign body granulomas for predominant Th2 response. In all situations, CD163+ cells usually outnumbered CD68+ cells. Moreover, CD163+ cells, usually considered as M2 macrophages, co-expressing pSTAT1 and RBP-J were found in all conditions examined. The numbers of putative M1 macrophages were higher in Th1- than in Th2-associated diseases, while more M2 macrophages were seen in Th2- than in Th1 related disorders. In most Th1-related diseases, the balance of M1 over M2 cells was shifted towards M1 cells, while the reverse was observed for Th2-related conditions. Hierarchical cluster analysis revealed two distinct clusters: cluster I included Th1 diseases together with cases with high numbers of CD163+pSTAT1+, CD68+pSTAT1+, CD163+RBP-J+ and CD68+RBP-J+ macrophages; cluster II comprised Th2 conditions together with cases displaying high numbers of CD163+CMAF+ and CD68+CMAF+ macrophages. These results suggest that the detection of pSTAT1, RBP-J, and CMAF in the context of CD68 or CD163 expression is a suitable tool for the characterisation of macrophage polarisation in situ. Furthermore, CD163 cannot be considered a reliable M2 marker when used on its own.

Indexed as

Antigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticBiomarkersCD163 AntigenCD68 MoleculeCluster AnalysisCrohn DiseaseGene ExpressionGranuloma, Foreign-BodyHumansHypersensitivityImmunoglobulin J Recombination Signal Sequence-Binding ProteinImmunohistochemistryImmunophenotypingInfectious MononucleosisMacrophagesAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticBiomarkersCD163 AntigenCD68 antigen, humanCD68 MoleculeImmunoglobulin J Recombination Signal Sequence-Binding ProteinMAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mafRBPJ protein, humanReceptors, Cell SurfaceSTAT1 protein, humanSTAT1 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID24260507
PMCPMC3829941
OpenAlexW2060766291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.