ArticlePloS one2013
Comparative transcriptome profiling of a resistant vs. susceptible tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivar in response to infection by tomato yellow leaf curl virus.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
76 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elucidation of theFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Review
- Review
- Integrating multi-omics and machine learning for disease resistance prediction in legumes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
- Comparison of Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus-Induced Gene Expression Pattern in Tomato and Tobacco Plants.The plant pathology journal · 2025Article
- Over Time Changes in the Transcriptomic Profiles of Tomato Plants with or WithoutPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Transcriptomics in solanaceous crop improvement: advances and opportunities.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Transcriptomic profiling reveals distinct responses to beet curly top virus (BCTV) infection in resistant and susceptible sugar beet genotypes.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Deciphering gene specific molecular characterization and partial gene sequence for combined resistance to tomato leaf curl virus (ToLCV) (Ty-1, Ty-2 and Ty-3), fusarium wilt (I-2) and root- knot nematode (Mi-1) in selected fresh market breeding line of tomato (Solanum lycopersicom L.).Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- Advances in understanding plant-pathogen interactions: insights from tomato as a model system.Virusdisease · 2024Review
- Ameliorating the effects of multiple stresses on agronomic traits in crops: modern biotechnological and omics approaches.Molecular biology reports · 2023Review
- Transcriptional and epigenetic changes during tomato yellow leaf curl virus infection in tomato.BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- Physiology and Gene Expression Analysis of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Exposed to Combined-Virus and Drought Stresses.The plant pathology journal · 2023Article
- Differential expression of genes during recovery of Nicotiana tabacum from tomato leaf curl Gujarat virus infection.Planta · 2023Article
- Transcriptome analysis during ToLCBaV disease development in contrasting tomato genotypes.3 Biotech · 2023Article
- Transcriptome Dynamics inViruses · 2023Article
- Comparison of Tomato Transcriptomic Profiles Reveals Overlapping Patterns in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Mutation introduced in DDTFR10/A gene of ethylene response element-binding protein (EREBP) family through CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing confers increased Fusarium wilt tolerance in tomato.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) threatens tomato production worldwide by causing leaf yellowing, leaf curling, plant stunting and flower abscission. The current understanding of the host plant defense response to this virus is very limited. Using whole transcriptome sequencing, we analyzed the differential gene expression in response to TYLCV infection in the TYLCV-resistant tomato breeding line CLN2777A (R) and TYLCV-susceptible tomato breeding line TMXA48-4-0 (S). The mixed inoculated samples from 3, 5 and 7 day post inoculation (dpi) were compared to non-inoculated samples at 0 dpi. Of the total of 34831 mapped transcripts, 209 and 809 genes were differentially expressed in the R and S tomato line, respectively. The proportion of up-regulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the R tomato line (58.37%) was higher than that in the S line (9.17%). Gene ontology (GO) analyses revealed that similar GO terms existed in both DEGs of R and S lines; however, some sets of defense related genes and their expression levels were not similar between the two tomato lines. Genes encoding for WRKY transcriptional factors, R genes, protein kinases and receptor (-like) kinases which were identified as down-regulated DEGs in the S line were up-regulated or not differentially expressed in the R line. The up-regulated DEGs in the R tomato line revealed the defense response of tomato to TYLCV infection was characterized by the induction and regulation of a series of genes involved in cell wall reorganization, transcriptional regulation, defense response, ubiquitination, metabolite synthesis and so on. The present study provides insights into various reactions underlining the successful establishment of resistance to TYLCV in the R tomato line, and helps in the identification of important defense-related genes in tomato for TYLCV disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.