ArticlePloS one2013
DNA barcoding of shark meats identify species composition and CITES-listed species from the markets in Taiwan.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- International trade regulations take a limited bite out of the shark fin trade.Science advances · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Determining the Authenticity of Shark Meat Products by DNA Sequencing.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Article
- Decision Theory-Based COI-SNP Tagging Approach for 126 Scombriformes Species Tagging.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Ethnotaxonomy of sharks from tropical waters of Brazil.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2018Article
- Multiplex real-time PCR assay to detect illegal trade of CITES-listed shark species.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Artisanal shark fishing in Milne Bay Province, Papua New Guinea: biomass estimation from genetically identified shark and ray fins.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- DNA-based identification reveals illegal trade of threatened shark species in a global elasmobranch conservation hotspot.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- DNA Barcoding for the Identification and Authentication of Animal Species in Traditional Medicine.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2018Review
- Analysis of the supply chain and conservation status of sharks (Elasmobranchii: Superorder Selachimorpha) based on fisher knowledge.PloS one · 2018Article
- Sequencing and characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Japanese Swellshark (Cephalloscyllium umbratile).Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Species identification and comparative population genetics of four coastal houndsharks based on novel NGS-mined microsatellites.Ecology and evolution · 2017Article
- Article
- The Species and Origin of Shark Fins in Taiwan's Fishing Ports, Markets, and Customs Detention: A DNA Barcoding Analysis.PloS one · 2016Article
- SkateBase, an elasmobranch genome project and collection of molecular resources for chondrichthyan fishes.F1000Research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn increasing awareness of the vulnerability of sharks to exploitation by shark finning has contributed to a growing concern about an unsustainable shark fishery. Taiwan's fleet has the 4th largest shark catch in the world, accounting for almost 6% of the global figures. Revealing the diversity of sharks consumed by Taiwanese is important in designing conservation plans. However, fins make up less than 5% of the total body weight of a shark, and their bodies are sold as filets in the market, making it difficult or impossible to identify species using morphological traits.
methodsIn the present study, we adopted a DNA barcoding technique using a 391-bp fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene to examine the diversity of shark filets and fins collected from markets and restaurants island-wide in Taiwan.
resultsAmongst the 548 tissue samples collected and sequenced, 20 major clusters were apparent by phylogenetic analyses, each of them containing individuals belonging to the same species (most with more than 95% bootstrap values), corresponding to 20 species of sharks. Additionally, Alopias pelagicus, Carcharhinus falciformis, Isurus oxyrinchus, and Prionace glauca consisted of 80% of the samples we collected, indicating that these species might be heavily consumed in Taiwan. Approximately 5% of the tissue samples used in this study were identified as species listed in CITES Appendix II, including two species of Sphyrna, C. longimanus and Carcharodon carcharias.
conclusionDNA barcoding provides an alternative method for understanding shark species composition when species-specific data is unavailable. Considering the global population decline, stock assessments of Appendix II species and highly consumed species are needed to accomplish the ultimate goal of shark conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.