Trial reportPloS one2013
Sex differences in itch perception and modulation by distraction--an FMRI pilot study in healthy volunteers.
Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- European S2k Guideline on Chronic PruritusActa dermato-venereologica · 2025Guideline
- Higher disease burden and greater small fibre impairment in women with painful diabetic neuropathy.Pain reports · 2026Article
- The contribution of endocytic mediators to itch transmission.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The contribution of endocytic mediators to itch transmission.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026Article
- Neuroimaging Characteristics of Pruritus Induced by Eczema: An fMRI Study.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Pre-existing skin diseases as predictors of post-burn pruritus.American journal of surgery · 2024Article
- The neuroscience of itch in relation to transdiagnostic psychological approaches.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Demographic and Clinical Factors Associated with Patient-Reported Remission in Psoriasis.Dermatology and therapy · 2022Article
- G-Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor (GPER) in the Rostral Ventromedial Medulla Is Essential for Mobilizing Descending Inhibition of Itch.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Affective Touch Reduces Electrically Induced Itch Experience.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Itch Matrixes.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Spinal cord NLRP1 inflammasome contributes to dry skin induced chronic itch in mice.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2020Article
- Clinical Characteristics of Itch in Renal Transplant Recipients.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Article
- Have We Just Scratched the Surface? A Narrative Review of Uremic Pruritus in 2020.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2020Review
- The vicious cycle of itch and anxiety.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2018Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEven though itch is a common syndrome of many diseases there is only little knowledge about sex and gender differences in pruritus, especially in central itch perception and modulation. To our knowledge, this is the first fMRI study examining sex differences in perception and its modulation by distraction.
methodsExperimental itch was induced by application of histamine (0.1 mM) via microdialysis fibers twice at the left forearm and twice at the left lower leg in 33 healthy volunteers (17 females, 16 males). The brain activation patterns were assessed by fMRI during itch without and with distraction (Stroop task). Between the various conditions, subjects were asked to rate itch intensity, desire to scratch and pain intensity. In a second experiment in 10 of the 33 volunteers histamine was replaced by saline solution to serve as control for the 'Stroop' condition.
resultsWomen generally presented higher itch intensities compared to men during itch over the course of the experiment. A more specific analysis revealed higher itch intensities and desire to scratch in women during experimental induced itch that can be reduced by distraction at the lower legs when itch is followed by 'Stroop'. In contrast, men depicted significant reduction of 'itch' by 'Stroop' at the forearms. Women depicted higher brain activation of structures responsible for integration of sensory, affective information and motor integration/planning during 'itch' and 'Stroop' condition when compared to men. No sex differences were seen in the saline control condition.
conclusionWomen and men exhibited localisation dependent differences in their itch perception with women presenting higher itch intensities and desire to scratch. Our findings parallel clinical observations of women reporting higher itch intensities depending on itch localisation and suffering more from itch as compared to men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.