Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24259587›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

Functional cooperation of metabotropic adenosine and glutamate receptors regulates postsynaptic plasticity in the cerebellum.

Yuji Kamikubo, Takeshi Shimomura, Yosuke Fujita, Toshihide Tabata, Taku Kashiyama, Takashi Sakurai, Kenkichi Fukurotani, Masanobu Kano

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Allosteric Modulation of Adenosine AInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. AMolecular neurobiology · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuji KamikuboDepartment of Pharmacology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan, Department of Neurophysiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo113-0033, Japan, and Laboratory for Neural Information Technology, Graduate School of Sciences and Engineering, The University of Toyama, Toyama 930-8555, Japan.
Takeshi Shimomura
Yosuke Fujita
Toshihide Tabata
Taku Kashiyama
Takashi Sakurai
Kenkichi Fukurotani
Masanobu Kano
University of Toyama · JPJuntendo University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) may form heteromeric complexes and cooperatively mediate cellular responses. Although heteromeric GPCR complexes are suggested to occur in many neurons, their contribution to neuronal function remains unclear. We address this question using two GPCRs expressed in cerebellar Purkinje cells: adenosine A1 receptor (A1R), which regulates neurotransmitter release and neuronal excitability in central neurons, and type-1 metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR1), which mediates cerebellar long-term depression, a form of synaptic plasticity crucial for cerebellar motor learning. We examined interaction between these GPCRs by immunocytochemical, biochemical, and Förster resonance energy transfer analyses in cultured mouse Purkinje cells and heterologous expression cells. These analyses revealed that the GPCRs closely colocalized and formed heteromeric complexes on the cell surfaces. Furthermore, our electrophysiological analysis showed that CSF levels (40-400 nm) of adenosine or synthetic A1R agonists with comparable potencies blocked mGluR1-mediated long-term depression of the postsynaptic glutamate-responsiveness (glu-LTD) of cultured Purkinje cells. A similar dose of the A1R agonist decreased the ligand affinity of mGluR1 and did not affect depolarization-induced Ca(2+) influx, which is an essential factor in inducing glu-LTD. The A1R agonist did not affect glu-LTD mimicked by direct activation of protein kinase C. These results suggest that A1R blocked glu-LTD by decreasing the ligand sensitivity of mGluR1, but not the coupling efficacy from mGluR1 to the intracellular signaling cascades. These findings provide a new insight into neuronal GPCR signaling and demonstrate a novel regulatory mechanism of synaptic plasticity.

Indexed as

AnimalsBicucullineCells, CulturedCerebellumDose-Response Relationship, DrugEmbryo, MammalianEnergy TransferExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsNeuroprotective AgentsQuinoxalines2,3-dioxo-6-nitro-7-sulfamoylbenzo(f)quinoxalineBicucullinebicuculline methiodideExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsGreen Fluorescent Proteinsmetabotropic glutamate receptor type 1Neuroprotective AgentsQuinoxalinesReceptor, Adenosine A1Receptors, Metabotropic GlutamateSodium Channel BlockersTetrodotoxin

Identifiers

PMID24259587
PMCPMC6618803
OpenAlexW2054418249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.