Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24258629›Full record

ReviewJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2014

Genome mining of Streptomyces ambofaciens.

Bertrand Aigle, Sylvie Lautru, Dieter Spiteller, Jeroen S Dickschat, Gregory L Challis, Pierre Leblond, Jean-Luc Pernodet

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biocontrol potential of newly isolatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genome mining for drug discovery: progress at the front end.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  20. 3 Biotech · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Bertrand AigleUniversité de Lorraine, Dynamique des Génomes et Adaptation Microbienne, UMR 1128, 54506, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France, bertrand.aigle@univ-lorraine.fr.
Sylvie Lautru
Dieter Spiteller
Jeroen S Dickschat
Gregory L Challis
Pierre Leblond
Jean-Luc Pernodet
Dynamique des Génomes et Adaptation Microbienne · FRExpression Génétique Microbienne · FRTechnische Universität Braunschweig · DEUniversité de Lorraine · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FRUniversity of Konstanz · DEUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the discovery of the streptomycin produced by Streptomyces griseus in the middle of the last century, members of this bacterial genus have been largely exploited for the production of secondary metabolites with wide uses in medicine and in agriculture. They have even been recognized as one of the most prolific producers of natural products among microorganisms. With the onset of the genomic era, it became evident that these microorganisms still represent a major source for the discovery of novel secondary metabolites. This was highlighted with the complete genome sequencing of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) which revealed an unexpected potential of this organism to synthesize natural products undetected until then by classical screening methods. Since then, analysis of sequenced genomes from numerous Streptomyces species has shown that a single species can carry more than 30 secondary metabolite gene clusters, reinforcing the idea that the biosynthetic potential of this bacterial genus is far from being fully exploited. This review highlights our knowledge on the potential of Streptomyces ambofaciens ATCC 23877 to synthesize natural products. This industrial strain was known for decades to only produce the drug spiramycin and another antibacterial compound, congocidine. Mining of its genome allowed the identification of 23 clusters potentially involved in the production of other secondary metabolites. Studies of some of these clusters resulted in the characterization of novel compounds and of previously known compounds but never characterized in this Streptomyces species. In addition, genome mining revealed that secondary metabolite gene clusters of phylogenetically closely related Streptomyces are mainly species-specific.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiological ProductsBiosynthetic PathwaysSecondary MetabolismStreptomycesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID24258629
OpenAlexW2008353386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.