Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24258612›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2014

Mineralogical variables that control the antibacterial effectiveness of a natural clay deposit.

Keith D Morrison, Jennifer C Underwood, David W Metge, Dennis D Eberl, Lynda B Williams

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DermominaFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antibacterial Activity of Clay Soils against Food-BorneMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Bacteriostatic and bactericidal clays: an overview.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The response of periodontal cells to kaolinite.Clinical oral investigations · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Keith D MorrisonSchool of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA, keith.morrison@asu.edu.
Jennifer C Underwood
David W Metge
Dennis D Eberl
Lynda B Williams
United States Geological Survey · USArizona State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains emerge and pose increased global health risks, new antibacterial agents are needed as alternatives to conventional antimicrobials. Naturally occurring antibacterial clays have been identified which are effective in killing antibiotic-resistant bacteria. This study examines a hydrothermally formed antibacterial clay deposit near Crater Lake, OR (USA). Our hypothesis is that antibacterial clays buffer pH and Eh conditions to dissolve unstable mineral phases containing transition metals (primarily Fe(2+)), while smectite interlayers serve as reservoirs for time release of bactericidal components. Model pathogens (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 14990) were incubated with clays from different alteration zones of the hydrothermal deposit. In vitro antibacterial susceptibility testing showed that reduced mineral zones were bactericidal, while more oxidized zones had variable antibacterial effect. TEM images showed no indication of cell lysis. Cytoplasmic condensation and cell wall accumulations of <100 nm particles were seen within both bacterial populations. Electron energy loss analysis indicates precipitation of intracellular Fe(3+)-oxide nanoparticles (<10 nm) in E. coli after 24 h. Clay minerals and pyrite buffer aqueous solutions to pH 2.5-3.1, Eh > 630 mV and contain elevated level (mM) of soluble Fe (Fe(2+) and Fe(3+)) and Al(3+). Our interpretation is that rapid uptake of Fe(2+) impairs bacterial metabolism by flooding the cell with excess Fe(2+) and overwhelming iron storage proteins. As the intracellular Fe(2+) oxidizes, it produces reactive oxygen species that damage biomolecules and precipitates Fe-oxides. The ability of antibacterial clays to buffer pH and Eh in chronic non-healing wounds to conditions of healthy skin appears key to their healing potential and viability as an alternative to conventional antibiotics.

Indexed as

AluminumAluminum SilicatesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCationsClayEscherichia coliHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIronMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning TransmissionMineralsOregonOxidation-ReductionStaphylococcus epidermidisSulfidesX-Ray DiffractionAluminumAluminum SilicatesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCationsClayIronMineralspyriteSulfides

Identifiers

PMID24258612
OpenAlexW2072211842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.