Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24258463›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2014

Transcatheter aortic valve insertion (TAVI): a review.

B Clayton, G Morgan-Hughes, C Roobottom

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05904912 (Evaluation of the Effect of Ultrasound-guided PENG Block on Postoperative Analgesia Management in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05904912 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Effect of Ultrasound-guided PENG Block on Postoperative Analgesia Management in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Randomized, Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedipol UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsAortic Valve Stenosis, Aortic DiseasesArmsPostoperative analgesia management, PENG-Bupivacaine, Local infiltration-Bupivacaine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. TAVI Through the Years: A Systematic Review of Progress.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

B ClaytonCardiology Department, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK.
G Morgan-Hughes
C Roobottom

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of transcatheter aortic valve insertion (TAVI) has transformed the care provided for patients with severe aortic stenosis. The uptake of this procedure is increasing rapidly, and clinicians from all disciplines are likely to increasingly encounter patients being assessed for or having undergone this intervention. Successful TAVI heavily relies on careful and comprehensive imaging assessment, before, during and after the procedure, using a range of modalities. This review outlines the background and development of TAVI, describes the nature of the procedure and considers the contribution of imaging techniques, both to successful intervention and to potential complications.

Indexed as

Aged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisCardiac CatheterizationHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumans

Identifiers

PMID24258463
PMCPMC3898978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.