Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24258160›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2014

Assessing the effect of dynamics on the closed-loop protein-folding hypothesis.

Sree V Chintapalli, Christopher J R Illingworth, Graham J G Upton, Sophie Sacquin-Mora, Philip J Reeves, Hani S Mohammedali, Christopher A Reynolds

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sree V ChintapalliSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, , Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.
Christopher J R Illingworth
Graham J G Upton
Sophie Sacquin-Mora
Philip J Reeves
Hani S Mohammedali
Christopher A Reynolds
University of Essex · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Medical Research Council G1001812Wellcome Trust 101239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The closed-loop (loop-n-lock) hypothesis of protein folding suggests that loops of about 25 residues, closed through interactions between the loop ends (locks), play an important role in protein structure. Coarse-grain elastic network simulations, and examination of loop lengths in a diverse set of proteins, each supports a bias towards loops of close to 25 residues in length between residues of high stability. Previous studies have established a correlation between total contact distance (TCD), a metric of sequence distances between contacting residues (cf. contact order), and the log-folding rate of a protein. In a set of 43 proteins, we identify an improved correlation (r(2) = 0.76), when the metric is restricted to residues contacting the locks, compared to the equivalent result when all residues are considered (r(2) = 0.65). This provides qualified support for the hypothesis, albeit with an increased emphasis upon the importance of a much larger set of residues surrounding the locks. Evidence of a similar-sized protein core/extended nucleus (with significant overlap) was obtained from TCD calculations in which residues were successively eliminated according to their hydrophobicity and connectivity, and from molecular dynamics simulations. Our results suggest that while folding is determined by a subset of residues that can be predicted by application of the closed-loop hypothesis, the original hypothesis is too simplistic; efficient protein folding is dependent on a considerably larger subset of residues than those involved in lock formation.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingAnimalsCattleElasticityHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsKineticsMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, BiologicalMolecular Dynamics SimulationMonte Carlo MethodProtein BindingProtein ConformationProteinsStreptococcusProteinsclosed-loop hypothesisclosed loopsconnectivityhydrophobicityprotein foldingtotal contact distance

Identifiers

PMID24258160
PMCPMC3869168
OpenAlexW2140172144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.