Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24258154›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2014

Mechanosensitive channels and bacterial cell wall integrity: does life end with a bang or a whimper?

Marcel Reuter, Nicholas J Hayward, Susan S Black, Samantha Miller, David T F Dryden, Ian R Booth

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Quiescence ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Bacterial Cell Mechanics.Biochemistry · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evaporation-induced stimulation of bacterial osmoregulation for electrical assessment of cell viability.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marcel ReuterSchool of Chemistry and COSMIC, University of Edinburgh, , The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, UK.
Nicholas J Hayward
Susan S Black
Samantha Miller
David T F Dryden
Ian R Booth
University of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council G0400277Wellcome Trust WT092552MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanogated channels are fundamental components of bacterial cells that enable retention of physical integrity during extreme increases in cell turgor. Optical tweezers combined with microfluidics have been used to study the fate of individual Escherichia coli cells lacking such channels when subjected to a bursting stress caused by increased turgor. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting and electron microscopy complement these studies. These analyses show that lysis occurs with a high probability, but the precise path differs between individual cells. By monitoring the loss of cytoplasmic green fluorescent protein, we have determined that some cells release this protein but remain phase dark (granular) consistent with the retention of the majority of large proteins. By contrast, most cells suffer cataclysmic wall failure leading to loss of granularity but with the retention of DNA and overall cell shape (protein-depleted ghosts). The time span of these events induced by hypo-osmotic shock varies but is of the order of milliseconds. The data are interpreted in terms of the timing of mechanosensitive channel gating relative to osmotically induced water influx.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaCell MembraneCell SeparationCell WallCytoplasmDNAEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsFlow CytometryGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMechanotransduction, CellularMicrofluidicsMicroscopy, ElectronMicroscopy, Phase-ContrastOptical TweezersOsmotic PressureDNAEscherichia coli ProteinsGreen Fluorescent Proteins(bacterial) cell wallbacterial stress responsefluorescence-activated cell sortingmechanosensitive channelsmicrofluidicsoptical tweezers

Identifiers

PMID24258154
PMCPMC3869158
OpenAlexW2148947237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.