Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24258110›Full record

SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014

Quantitative assessment of the association between microRNA-499 rs3746444 A/G polymorphism and cancer risk.

Hongzhi Sun, Qing Li, Tao Yang, Wei Wang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hongzhi SunDepartment of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Liaoning Medical University, Jinzhou, 121001, China, hongzhilnmu@hotmail.com.
Qing Li
Tao Yang
Wei Wang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between microRNA-499 rs3746444 A/G polymorphism and cancer risk, but published data are still inconclusive. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between microRNA-499 rs3746444 A/G polymorphism and cancer susceptibility. The summary odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to evaluate the association. Seventeen case-control studies with a total of 7,974 cancer cases and 9,404 controls were finally included into this meta-analysis. Overall, microRNA-499 rs3746444 A/G polymorphism was significantly associated with increased risk in both the domain model (GG/AG versus AA: OR = 1.17, 95% CI, 1.03-1.33, P = 0.02) and the heterozygote comparison model (AG versus AA: OR = 1.15, 95% CI, 1.01-1.32, P = 0.03) when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis by ethnicity showed that association between microRNA-499 rs3746444 A/G polymorphism and cancer susceptibility was significant in Asians, but not in Caucasians. In the subgroup analysis by cancer types, no risk of breast, liver, or lung cancers were found significantly associated with microRNA-499 rs3746444 A/G polymorphism in any of the genetic models. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that microRNA-499 rs3746444 A/G polymorphism is associated with increased susceptibility to cancer in Asians. However, more well-designed studies with large sample size are needed to validate this association among different kinds of cancers.

Indexed as

Asian PeopleCase-Control StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHumansMicroRNAsNeoplasmsOdds RatioPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsMicroRNAsMIRN499 microRNA, human

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.