Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24258092›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013

Inspiratory muscle training for cystic fibrosis.

Brian W Houston, Nicola Mills, Arturo Solis-Moya

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Respiratory muscle training for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Respiratory muscle training for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Physical exercise training for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Effects of home-based respiratory muscle training in children and adolescents with chronic lung disease.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Brian W HoustonSchool of Health & Social Care, Teesside University, Victoria Road, Middlesbrough, Cleveland, UK, TS1 3BA.
Nicola Mills
Arturo Solis-Moya
Glenfield Hospital · GBHospital Nacional de Niños · CRTeesside University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCystic fibrosis is the most common life-limiting genetic condition in Caucasians and the life-expectancy of those newly diagnosed is increasing. Inspiratory muscle training may be a way of improving the lung function and quality of life of people with cystic fibrosis. Hence there is a need to establish whether this intervention is beneficial.

objectivesTo determine the effect of inspiratory muscle training on health-related quality of life, pulmonary function and exercise tolerance. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials register comprising of references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings.Date of most recent search: 08 July 2013. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised clinical controlled trials comparing different inspiratory muscle training regimens with each other or a control in people with cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors independently applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria to publications and assessed the quality of the included studies. MAIN

resultsFourteen studies were identified. Of these eight studies with 180 participants met the review inclusion criteria. There was wide variation in the quality of the included studies. Data were not published in sufficient detail or with sufficiently similar outcome measures in these studies to perform meta-analyses. AUTHORS'

conclusionsWe have not found any evidence to suggest that this treatment is either beneficial or not. We would advise that practitioners evaluate on a case-by-case basis whether or not to employ this therapy. We recommend that future studies make more use of health-related quality of life and exercise tolerance measures; and that there is an agreement upon a single standard measure of classifying the clinical status of the participants.

Indexed as

Breathing ExercisesCystic FibrosisHumansInhalationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory Muscles

Identifiers

PMID24258092
OpenAlexW2159695781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.