ArticleCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2014
Induction of recombination between diverged sequences in a mammalian genome by a double-strand break.
Article in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate whether mammalian cells can carry out recombinational double-strand break (DSB) repair between highly diverged sequences, mouse fibroblasts were transfected with DNA substrates that contained a "recipient" thymidine kinase (tk) gene disrupted by the recognition site for endonuclease I-SceI. Substrates also contained a linked "donor" tk gene sequence. Following DSB induction by I-SceI, selection for tk-expressing clones allowed recovery of repair events occurring by nonhomologous end-joining or recombination with the donor sequence. Although recombinational repair was most efficient when donor and recipient shared near-perfect homology, we recovered recombination events between recipient and donor sequences displaying 20 % nucleotide mismatch. Recombination between such imperfectly matched ("homeologous") sequences occurred at a frequency of 1.7 × 10(-7) events per cell and constituted 3 % of the DSB repair events recovered with the pair of homeologous sequences. Additional experiments were done with a substrate containing a donor sequence comprised of a region sharing high homology with the recipient and an adjacent region homeologous to the recipient. Recombinational DSB repair tracts initiating within high homology propagated into homeology in 11 of 112 repair events. These collective results contrasted with our earlier work in which spontaneous recombination (not intentionally induced by a DSB) between homeologous sequences occurred at an undetectable frequency of less than 10(-9) events per cell, and in which events initiating within high homology propagated into adjoining homeology in one of 81 events examined. Our current work suggests that homology requirements for recombination are effectively relaxed in proximity to a DSB in a mammalian genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.