Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24257623›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2014

Brain tumor specifies intermediate progenitor cell identity by attenuating β-catenin/Armadillo activity.

Hideyuki Komori, Qi Xiao, Brooke M McCartney, Cheng-Yu Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Temporal neuronal differentiation programs safeguard neuronal diversity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. RNA-binding is the essential biological function of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. CNN-based glioma detection in MRI: A deep learning approach.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hideyuki KomoriCenter for Stem Cell Biology, Life Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Qi Xiao
Brooke M McCartney
Cheng-Yu Lee

Funding

Brain tumor restricts developmental potential in intermediate progenitor cellsR01NS077914 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LEE, CHENG-YU · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS077914NINDS NIH HHS R01NS077914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During asymmetric stem cell division, both the daughter stem cell and the presumptive intermediate progenitor cell inherit cytoplasm from their parental stem cell. Thus, proper specification of intermediate progenitor cell identity requires an efficient mechanism to rapidly extinguish the activity of self-renewal factors, but the mechanisms remain unknown in most stem cell lineages. During asymmetric division of a type II neural stem cell (neuroblast) in the Drosophila larval brain, the Brain tumor (Brat) protein segregates unequally into the immature intermediate neural progenitor (INP), where it specifies INP identity by attenuating the function of the self-renewal factor Klumpfuss (Klu), but the mechanisms are not understood. Here, we report that Brat specifies INP identity through its N-terminal B-boxes via a novel mechanism that is independent of asymmetric protein segregation. Brat-mediated specification of INP identity is critically dependent on the function of the Wnt destruction complex, which attenuates the activity of β-catenin/Armadillo (Arm) in immature INPs. Aberrantly increasing Arm activity in immature INPs further exacerbates the defects in the specification of INP identity and enhances the supernumerary neuroblast mutant phenotype in brat mutant brains. By contrast, reducing Arm activity in immature INPs suppresses supernumerary neuroblast formation in brat mutant brains. Finally, reducing Arm activity also strongly suppresses supernumerary neuroblasts induced by overexpression of klu. Thus, the Brat-dependent mechanism extinguishes the function of the self-renewal factor Klu in the presumptive intermediate progenitor cell by attenuating Arm activity, balancing stem cell maintenance and progenitor cell specification.

Indexed as

AnimalsArmadillo Domain Proteinsbeta CateninCell DifferentiationCell DivisionCell LineageCell ProliferationDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsNeural Stem CellsTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticTumor Suppressor ProteinsWnt ProteinsWnt Signaling PathwayAPC2 protein, DrosophilaArmadillo Domain ProteinsARM protein, Drosophilabeta Cateninbrat protein, DrosophilaDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsKlu protein, DrosophilaTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor ProteinsWnt ProteinsApc2Brain tumorDrosophilaIntermediate progenitor cellNeuroblastWnt signaling

Identifiers

PMID24257623
PMCPMC3865749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.