Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24257367›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in rheumatology2014

Biomarkers in vasculitis.

Paul A Monach

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in rheumatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Biomarkers in Primary Systemic Vasculitides: Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. New Biomarkers for Systemic Necrotizing Vasculitides.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Mechanism and biomarkers in aortitis--a review.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul A MonachBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston University · US

Funding

VCRC-VF FellowshipU54AR057319 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MERKEL, PETER A · 2009 to 2020
$12.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS U54 AR057319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewBetter biomarkers are needed for guiding management of patients with vasculitis. Large cohorts and technological advances had led to an increase in preclinical studies of potential biomarkers. RECENT

findingsThe most interesting markers described recently include a gene expression signature in CD8+ T cells that predicts tendency to relapse or remain relapse-free in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, and a pair of urinary proteins that are elevated in Kawasaki disease but not other febrile illnesses. Both of these studies used 'omics' technologies to generate and then test hypotheses. More conventional hypothesis-based studies have indicated that the following circulating proteins have potential to improve upon clinically available tests: pentraxin-3 in giant cell arteritis and Takayasu's arteritis; von Willebrand factor antigen in childhood central nervous system vasculitis; eotaxin-3 and other markers related to eosinophils or Th2 immune responses in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss syndrome); and matrix metalloproteinase-3, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1, and CXCL13 in ANCA-associated vasculitis. SUMMARY: New markers testable in blood and urine have the potential to assist with diagnosis, staging, assessment of current disease activity, and prognosis. However, the standards for clinical usefulness, in particular, the demonstration of either very high sensitivity or very high specificity have yet to be met for clinically relevant outcomes.

Indexed as

Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated VasculitisBiomarkersGiant Cell ArteritisHumansMucocutaneous Lymph Node SyndromePrognosisTakayasu ArteritisVasculitisBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID24257367
PMCPMC4015522
OpenAlexW1990826867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.