Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24257248›Full record

ArticleNeuroreport2013

Is the adult mouse striatum a hostile host for neural transplant survival?

Victoria H Roberton, Amy E Evans, David J Harrison, Sophie V Precious, Stephen B Dunnett, Claire M Kelly, Anne E Rosser

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroreport, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria H RobertonaBrain Repair Group, School of Biosciences bSchool of Medicine, MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Cardiff University cSchool of Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.
Amy E Evans
David J Harrison
Sophie V Precious
Stephen B Dunnett
Claire M Kelly
Anne E Rosser
Cardiff Metropolitan University · GBCardiff University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1001257Parkinson's UK G-1105Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human donor cells, including neurally directed embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells with the potential to be used for neural transplantation in a range of neurodegenerative disorders, must first be tested preclinically in rodent models of disease to demonstrate safety and efficacy. One strategy for circumventing the rejection of xenotransplanted human cells is to desensitize the host animal to human cells in the early neonatal period so that a subsequent transplant in adulthood is not immunorejected. This method has been robustly validated in the rat, but currently not in the mouse in which most transgenic models of neurodegeneration have been generated. Thus, we set out to determine whether this could be achieved through modification of the existing rat protocol. Mice were inoculated in the neonatal period with a suspension of human embryonic cortical tissue of varying cell numbers, and received a subsequent human embryonic cortical tissue cell transplant in adulthood. Graft survival was compared with those in mice immunosuppressed with cyclosporine A and those receiving allografts of mouse whole ganglionic eminence tissue. Poor survival was found across all groups, suggesting a general problem with the use of mouse hosts for testing human donor cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain Tissue TransplantationCerebral CortexCorpus StriatumFemaleFetal Tissue TransplantationGraft SurvivalHumansMaleMiceTransplantation, Heterologous

Identifiers

PMID24257248
PMCPMC3942349
OpenAlexW2095695478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.