Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24256697›Full record

ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2013

Pup mortality in laboratory mice--infanticide or not?

Elin M Weber, Bo Algers, Jan Hultgren, I Anna S Olsson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Killing behaviors in rodents: from predation to infanticide.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Metaphylactic Antibiotic Treatment to Prevent the Transmission ofJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. From Entry to Early Dissemination-Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elin M WeberDepartment of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,PO Box 234,532 23 Skara, Sweden. elin.weber@slu.se.
Bo Algers
Jan Hultgren
I Anna S Olsson
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite being the most commonly used mammal in biomedical research, problems with perinatal mortality in mice have received little attention and the causes of pup death are still poorly known. Females are often housed alone with their litters and since the lost pups are generally eaten, it is commonly assumed that the mother has killed them. However, more detailed observations than have been reported previously in the literature are required to establish if the cause of death is infanticide. Litter loss can only be prevented efficiently after underlying causes have been carefully investigated and interpreted. The aim of this study was to investigate if females actively kill their pups by observing the behaviour of females and pups in litters that later were lost. We used video recordings of females that lost their entire litter to observe females in detail from parturition until the pups died. In total, 10 C57BL/6 females (wildtype and the knockouts Hfe-/- and β2m-/-) were studied, housed in Makrolon II cages with or without access to a small amount of nesting material.

resultsThree of the females had pups that were never seen moving, and another three females had one or two pups that never moved, indicating that some pups were most likely still-born. In five females with live-born pups, detailed observations from the time when a pup was last seen moving until it died were possible to carry out. We observed females eating dead offspring and interacting with both moving and dead pups. However, we never observed a pup stop moving when manipulated by the female, nor were any wounds seen in the pups. Hence, we found no evidence of infanticide when studying females that had lost their entire litter.

conclusionThese results suggest that other causes than infanticide plays a major role in mouse pup death, and stress the need for more systematic and careful investigations of the causality of litter loss.

Indexed as

Animals, NewbornBehavior, AnimalMaternal BehaviorAnimalsbeta 2-MicroglobulinCannibalismFemaleGene Expression RegulationHemochromatosis ProteinHistocompatibility Antigens Class IMembrane ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutPregnancyStillbirthbeta 2-MicroglobulinHemochromatosis ProteinHfe protein, mouseHistocompatibility Antigens Class IMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24256697
PMCPMC4176978
OpenAlexW2114414120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.