ReviewBioanalysis2013
Progress in the development of paper-based diagnostics for low-resource point-of-care settings.
Review in Bioanalysis, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Field‑use device for the electrochemical quantification of carbamazepine levels in a background of human saliva.Journal of applied electrochemistry · 2023Article
- Nanocellulose coated paper diagnostic to measure glucose concentration in human blood.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Optical-Based Biosensors and Their Portable Healthcare Devices for Detecting and Monitoring Biomarkers in Body Fluids.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Pressure-Modulated Selective Electrokinetic Trapping for Direct Enrichment, Purification, and Detection of Nucleic Acids in Human Serum.Analytical chemistry · 2018Article
- The Role of Nanoparticle Design in Determining Analytical Performance of Lateral Flow Immunoassays.Nano letters · 2017Article
- Inkjet-printed point-of-care immunoassay on a nanoscale polymer brush enables subpicomolar detection of analytes in blood.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Investigation of Reagent Delivery Formats in a Multivalent Malaria Sandwich Immunoassay and Implications for Assay Performance.Analytical chemistry · 2016Article
- Development of a Whole Blood Paper-Based Device for Phenylalanine Detection in the Context of PKU Therapy Monitoring.Micromachines · 2016Article
- A versatile valving toolkit for automating fluidic operations in paper microfluidic devices.Lab on a chip · 2015Article
- Enabling robust quantitative readout in an equipment-free model of device development.The Analyst · 2014Review
- Addressing Barriers to the Development and Adoption of Rapid Diagnostic Tests in Global Health.NanobiomedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This Review focuses on recent work in the field of paper microfluidics that specifically addresses the goal of translating the multistep processes that are characteristic of gold-standard laboratory tests to low-resource point-of-care settings. A major challenge is to implement multistep processes with the robust fluid control required to achieve the necessary sensitivity and specificity of a given application in a user-friendly package that minimizes equipment. We review key work in the areas of fluidic controls for automation in paper-based devices, readout methods that minimize dedicated equipment, and power and heating methods that are compatible with low-resource point-of-care settings. We also highlight a focused set of recent applications and discuss future challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.