Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24256031›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013

Detecting small plant peptides using SPADA (Small Peptide Alignment Discovery Application).

Peng Zhou, Kevin At Silverstein, Liangliang Gao, Jonathan D Walton, Sumitha Nallu, Joseph Guhlin, Nevin D Young

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Peptide hormones in plants.Molecular horticulture · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Peptidomics.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2023
    Article
  11. Pollen Coat Proteomes ofBiomolecules · 2023
    Article
  12. Peptidomics Methods Applied to the Study of Flower Development.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peng ZhouDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St, Paul, Minnesota 55108, USA. neviny@umn.edu.
Kevin At Silverstein
Liangliang Gao
Jonathan D Walton
Sumitha Nallu
Joseph Guhlin
Nevin D Young
University of Minnesota · USMichigan State University · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

BIOSYNTHESIS OF THE CYCLIC PEPTIDE TOXINS OF AMANITA MUSHROOMSR01GM088274 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WALTON, JONATHAN · 2011 to 2014
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01-GM088274NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmall peptides encoded as one- or two-exon genes in plants have recently been shown to affect multiple aspects of plant development, reproduction and defense responses. However, popular similarity search tools and gene prediction techniques generally fail to identify most members belonging to this class of genes. This is largely due to the high sequence divergence among family members and the limited availability of experimentally verified small peptides to use as training sets for homology search and ab initio prediction. Consequently, there is an urgent need for both experimental and computational studies in order to further advance the accurate prediction of small peptides.

resultsWe present here a homology-based gene prediction program to accurately predict small peptides at the genome level. Given a high-quality profile alignment, SPADA identifies and annotates nearly all family members in tested genomes with better performance than all general-purpose gene prediction programs surveyed. We find numerous mis-annotations in the current Arabidopsis thaliana and Medicago truncatula genome databases using SPADA, most of which have RNA-Seq expression support. We also show that SPADA works well on other classes of small secreted peptides in plants (e.g., self-incompatibility protein homologues) as well as non-secreted peptides outside the plant kingdom (e.g., the alpha-amanitin toxin gene family in the mushroom, Amanita bisporigera).

conclusionsSPADA is a free software tool that accurately identifies and predicts the gene structure for short peptides with one or two exons. SPADA is able to incorporate information from profile alignments into the model prediction process and makes use of it to score different candidate models. SPADA achieves high sensitivity and specificity in predicting small plant peptides such as the cysteine-rich peptide families. A systematic application of SPADA to other classes of small peptides by research communities will greatly improve the genome annotation of different protein families in public genome databases.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmanitaAmino Acid SequenceArabidopsisGenome, PlantMedicago truncatulaPeptidesPredictive Value of TestsSequence AlignmentSequence HomologySoftwarePeptides

Identifiers

PMID24256031
PMCPMC3924332
OpenAlexW2083883211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.