Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24255910›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of sports medicine2013

Yin and yang, or peas in a pod? Individual-sport versus team-sport athletes and altitude training.

Robert J Aughey, Martin Buchheit, Laura A Garvican-Lewis, Gregory D Roach, Charli Sargent, François Billaut, Matthew C Varley, Pitre C Bourdon, Christopher J Gore

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of sports medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Robert J AugheyInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living, Victoria University, , Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Martin Buchheit
Laura A Garvican-Lewis
Gregory D Roach
Charli Sargent
François Billaut
Matthew C Varley
Pitre C Bourdon
Christopher J Gore
ACT GovernmentAspire Academy · QACentral Queensland University · AUVictoria University · AUInstitut National du Sport, de l'Expertise et de la Performance · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The question of whether altitude training can enhance subsequent sea-level performance has been well investigated over many decades. However, research on this topic has focused on athletes from individual or endurance sports, with scant number of studies on team-sport athletes. Questions that need to be answered include whether this type of training may enhance team-sport athlete performance, when success in team-sport is often more based on technical and tactical ability rather than physical capacity per se. This review will contrast and compare athletes from two sports representative of endurance (cycling) and team-sports (soccer). Specifically, we draw on the respective competition schedules, physiological capacities, activity profiles and energetics of each sport to compare the similarities between athletes from these sports and discuss the relative merits of altitude training for these athletes. The application of conventional live-high, train-high; live-high, train-low; and intermittent hypoxic training for team-sport athletes in the context of the above will be presented. When the above points are considered, we will conclude that dependent on resources and training objectives, altitude training can be seen as an attractive proposition to enhance the physical performance of team-sport athletes without the need for an obvious increase in training load.

Indexed as

AltitudeYin-YangAcclimatizationAthletic PerformanceBicyclingEnergy MetabolismExerciseHumansOxygen ConsumptionSoccerTime FactorsAltitudeCyclingSoccer

Identifiers

PMID24255910
PMCPMC3841751
OpenAlexW2147995242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.