ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2013
Analysis of the severity and prognosis assessment of aged patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- The mortality risk factor of community acquired pneumonia patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2018Article
- IL-6 and TNF-α serum levels are associated with early death in community-acquired pneumonia patients.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2015Article
- Interleukin-6 and procalcitonin as biomarkers in mortality prediction of hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia.Annals of thoracic medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a prevalent and potentially life-threatening infection, and has poor prognosis in aged patients. The objective of this study was to compare the potential of admission N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (proBNP) levels and scoring models [CURB-65, Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores] to predict outcomes for aged patients with CAP admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and to explore the prognostic factors.
methodsClinical data of the patients were collected retrospectively, whose CURB-65, PSI, APACHE II scores were calculated and in whom measurements of proBNP was performed. The outcomes of interest were severity evaluation, prediction of need for mechanical ventilation and 28-day mortality. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was conducted to predict the assessment ability of proBNP and scoring models on different outcomes, and the logistic regression analysis was performed to screen factors affecting prognosis.
results240 patients were enrolled, with the mean age of 75±8 years old. Admission levels of NT-proBNP, scoring models were significantly higher in SCAP patients, MV group, and non-survivors compared to non-SCAP patients, no-MV group, and 28-day survivors, respectively (P<0.001). PSI had the highest area under the curve (AUC) and specificity for the three outcomes considered (AUC: 0.868 and specificity: 0.906 for 28-day mortality, AUC: 0.864 and specificity: 0.831 for requirement of MV, and AUC: 0.888 and specificity: 0.894 for severity evaluation). NT-proBNP had the highest sensitivity of 0.987 and 0.903 on prediction of mortality and need for MV. And APACHE II scoring model with the highest sensitivity of 0.890 was used to evaluate severity. Logistic regression analysis showed that the odd ratio (OR) of systolic blood pressure, PSI, and APACHE II scores were 0.886, 1.019, and 1.249.
conclusionsPSI scores was the best indicator in predicting different clinical outcomes of aged patients with CAP among the proBNP and three scoring systems. Systolic blood pressure might be as a protective factor for prognosis while PSI and APACHE II scores as risk factors for prognosis of aged patients with CAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.