Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24255771›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2013

Cytokeratin-based CTC counting unrelated to clinical follow up.

Ludmilla Thomé Domingos Chinen, Fernanda Machado de Carvalho, Bruna Maria Malagoli Rocha, Caroline Motta Aguiar, Emne Ali Abdallah, Daniel Campanha, Natália Breve Mingues, Thiago Bueno de Oliveira, Macello Sampaio Maciel, Gustavo Marchioro Cervantes and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Breaking the mold: 3D cell cultures reshaping the future of cancer research.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Cellular Expression of PD-L1 in the Peripheral Blood of Lung Cancer Patients is Associated with Worse Survival.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ludmilla Thomé Domingos ChinenDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, AC Camargo Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil; ; Department of Clinical Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil;
Fernanda Machado de Carvalho
Bruna Maria Malagoli Rocha
Caroline Motta Aguiar
Emne Ali Abdallah
Daniel Campanha
Natália Breve Mingues
Thiago Bueno de Oliveira
Macello Sampaio Maciel
Gustavo Marchioro Cervantes
Aldo L A Dettino
Fernando Augusto Soares
Patrizia Paterlini-Bréchot
Marcello Ferretti Fanelli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating tumor cells (CTCs) have been reported to be a relevant prognostic biomarker in metastatic patients. However, their clinical use and impact is still under debate. We have thus comparatively and kinetically assessed two CTC detection methods according to the patient's clinical follow up.

methodsCTC counting and characterization were repeatedly performed during follow up in a patient with metastatic undifferentiated non-small cell lung cancer by using cytokeratin (CK)-dependent immunomagnetic separation (Miltenyi) and CK-independent, size-based isolation [isolation by size of tumor cells (ISET)] (Rarecells).

resultsComparison between the two methods showed a parallel increase of CTC detected by ISET and worsening of the clinical status, while CK-dependent CTC numbers were decreasing, misleadingly suggesting a response to treatment. ISET results were in agreement with the clinical follow up showing Circulating tumor microemboli (CTM) and CTC expressing a mesenchymal marker with absence of epithelial markers.

conclusionsThis case report study shows the interest of a comparative and kinetic analysis of different methods for CTCs detection combined with their evaluation according to the clinical follow up. Our results should open up an area for future research and validation in larger clinical cohorts.

Indexed as

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs)circulating tumor microemboli (CTM)immunomagnetic separationisolation by size of tumor cells (ISET)lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID24255771
PMCPMC3815714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.