Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24254440›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2014

Frequency preference in two-dimensional neural models: a linear analysis of the interaction between resonant and amplifying currents.

Horacio G Rotstein, Farzan Nadim

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dynamics of interaction betweenCognitive neurodynamics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Horacio G RotsteinDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 323 Martin Luther King Blvd., Newark, NJ, 07102, USA, horacio@njit.edu.
Farzan Nadim
New Jersey Institute of Technology · US

Funding

REGULATION OF NEURONAL OSCILLATIONS BY SYNAPTIC DYNAMICSR01MH060605 · NIMH · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Dirk Martin Bucher, Farzan Nadim · 2001 to 2026
$6.6M
The role of axons in neural codingR01NS083319 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BUCHER, DIRK MARTIN, NADIM, FARZAN · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS MH060605NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060605NINDS NIH HHS NS083319NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS083319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many neuron types exhibit preferred frequency responses in their voltage amplitude (resonance) or phase shift to subthreshold oscillatory currents, but the effect of biophysical parameters on these properties is not well understood. We propose a general framework to analyze the role of different ionic currents and their interactions in shaping the properties of impedance amplitude and phase in linearized biophysical models and demonstrate this approach in a two-dimensional linear model with two effective conductances g L and g1. We compute the key attributes of impedance and phase (resonance frequency and amplitude, zero-phase frequency, selectivity, etc.) in the g(L) - g1 parameter space. Using these attribute diagrams we identify two basic mechanisms for the generation of resonance: an increase in the resonance amplitude as g1 increases while the overall impedance is decreased, and an increase in the maximal impedance, without any change in the input resistance, as the ionic current time constant increases. We use the attribute diagrams to analyze resonance and phase of the linearization of two biophysical models that include resonant (I h or slow potassium) and amplifying currents (persistent sodium). In the absence of amplifying currents, the two models behave similarly as the conductances of the resonant currents is increased whereas, with the amplifying current present, the two models have qualitatively opposite responses. This work provides a general method for decoding the effect of biophysical parameters on linear membrane resonance and phase by tracking trajectories, parametrized by the relevant biophysical parameter, in pre-constructed attribute diagrams.

Indexed as

Linear ModelsModels, NeurologicalAnimalsBiophysicsElectric ImpedanceHumansMembrane PotentialsNeurons

Identifiers

PMID24254440
PMCPMC4028432
OpenAlexW2024275179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.