Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24253933›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2014

Analysis of risk factors of subsequent fractures after vertebroplasty.

Gang Sun, Hai Tang, Min Li, Xunwei Liu, Peng Jin, Li Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of anti-osteoporosis medication on refracture prevention following osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Clinical and radiological subsequent fractures after vertebral augmentation for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Analysis of adjacent vertebral fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty: do radiological or surgical features matter?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gang SunDepartment of Medical Imaging, Jinan Military General Hospital, No. 25 Shifan Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250031, People's Republic of China, cjr.sungang@vip.163.com.
Hai Tang
Min Li
Xunwei Liu
Peng Jin
Li Li
Jinan Military General Hospital · CNBeijing Friendship Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to identify risk factors related to the development of subsequent fractures after vertebroplasty.

methodA retrospective study was conducted to review 175 patients with a 1-year follow-up who underwent vertebroplasty for first-time and single-level osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Subsequent fractures were diagnosed as recurrent intractable back pain, post-operatively correlated with MR image. Clinical parameters, such as age, gender, baseline VAS-score, lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) T-score, history of use of steroids, bisphosphonate therapy, symptom-free interval, the amount of bone cement injected, vacuum clefts, leakage of cement into the disk space, treated level and the changes of spinal geometry were recorded.

resultsDuring the follow-up period, subsequent fractures developed in 37 (21.1 %) of 175 patients. Significant differences (P < 0.05) were found between the patients with subsequent fractures and the patients without subsequent fractures in regard to their BMD T-score, and treated vertebrae location. Average BMD T-score was -3.4 ± 1.5 in patients with subsequent fractures and -2.9 ± 1.6 in patients without subsequent fractures. The percentage of subsequent fractures was 13.9 % (10 of 72) for treated vertebrae located in non-thoracolumbar junction, and 26.2 % (27 of 103) in the thoracolumbar junction.

conclusionThe most important risk factors affecting subsequent fractures after vertebroplasty were osteoporosis and treated level at the thoracolumbar junction.

Indexed as

AgedBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFractures, CompressionHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMultivariate AnalysisOsteoporotic FracturesRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSpinal FracturesBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonates

Identifiers

PMID24253933
OpenAlexW2010320939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.