Vascular involvement in cardiac giant cell myocarditis: a new pathophysiological aspect.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The role of cardiac lymphatic dysfunction in the progression of myocarditis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
   Review
2. High-risk and low prevalence disease: Cardiac sarcoidosis and some of its mimics.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2023
   Review
3. Evaluation of Myocardial Gene Expression Profiling for Superior Diagnosis of Idiopathic Giant-Cell Myocarditis and Clinical Feasibility in a Large Cohort of Patients with Acute Cardiac Decompensation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
   Article
4. T1 and T2 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging techniques reveal unapparent myocardial injury in patients with myocarditis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2017
   Article
5. Small steps for idiopathic giant cell myocarditis.Current heart failure reports · 2015
   Review
6. Diagnostic value of CMR in young patients with clinically suspected acute myocarditis is determined by cardiac enzymes.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2015
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as