Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24252711›Full record

ArticleMidwifery2014

Maternal accounts of their breast-feeding intent and early challenges after caesarean childbirth.

Kristin P Tully, Helen L Ball

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Midwifery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05292924 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Immediate vs Early Skin-to-skin Contact in Cesarean Births and Its Effect on Breastfeeding

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsociación Mexicana de Salud PrimalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled280ConditionsBreastfeeding, Exclusive, Mother-Child Relations, Kangaroo-mother CareArmsEarly SCC
NCT06266806 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of the Theory-Based Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Resources Developing Nurse Consultancy Program on Social Support Perception, Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy and Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorOndokuz Mayıs UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsBreastfeeding, Exclusive, Nurse's Role, Self EfficacyArmsNurse Consultancy Program to Develop Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Resources
NCT06533449 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Development of the Couplet Care Bassinet to Support Safe Implementation of Skin-to-skin Contact and rooming-in on Postnatal Units

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled160ConditionsBreastfeeding, Sleep, Patient SatisfactionArmsCouplet Care Bassinet, Standard Bassinet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Australian Women's Experiences of Establishing Breastfeeding after Caesarean Birth.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristin P TullyCenter for Developmental Science, Carolina Global Breastfeeding Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 100 East Franklin Street, Suite 200, Campus Box 8115, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States. Electronic address: kristin.tully@unc.edu.
Helen L BallDepartment of Anthropology, Wolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
Durham University · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Human Development: Interdisiplinary Research TrainingT32HD007376 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BELGER, AYSENIL, PROPPER, CATHI BARBRA · 1988 to 2020
$8.0M
NICHD NIH HHS 5T32HD007376-22NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundbreast-feeding outcomes are often worse after caesarean section compared to vaginal childbirth.

objectivesthis study characterises mothers' breast-feeding intentions and their infant feeding experiences after caesarean childbirth.

methodsdata are from 115 mothers on a postnatal unit in Northeast England during February 2006-March 2009. Interviews were conducted an average of 1.5 days (range 1-6 days) after the women underwent unscheduled or scheduled caesarean.

resultsthematic analysis of the data suggested was mostly considered the 'right thing to do,' preferable, natural, and 'supposedly healthier,' but tiring and painful. Advantages of supplementation involved more satiated infants, feeding ease, and longer sleep bouts. The need for 'thinking about yourself' was part of caesarean recovery. Infrequent feeding was concerning but also enabled maternal rest. Other breast-feeding obstacles were maternal mobility limitations, positioning difficulties, and frustration at the need for assistance. Participants were confused about nocturnal infant wakings, leading many to determine that they had insufficient milk. Mothers were surprised that sub-clinically poor infant condition was common following caesarean section. Some breast-feeding difficulty stemmed from 'mucus' expulsion that had to occur before the infants could be 'interested' in feeding. Women who cited motivations for breast feeding that included benefit to themselves were more likely to exclusively breast feed on the postnatal unit after their caesareans than those who reported infant-only motivations.

conclusionsfor the majority of mothers, breast feeding after a caesarean is affected by interrelated and compounding difficulties. Provision of more relational breast-feeding information may enable families to better anticipate early feeding experiences after caesarean section childbirth.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingCesarean SectionHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSelf EfficacyAdolescentAdultDelivery, ObstetricEnglandFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicMidwiferyPregnancyYoung AdultBreast feedingCaesarean sectionInfant feedingMothers

Identifiers

PMID24252711
PMCPMC4451198
OpenAlexW2018368835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.