Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2013
A randomized trial of genotype-guided dosing of warfarin.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 348 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
EUropean Pharmacogenetics of AntiCoagulant Therapy - Warfarin
National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Global Health Research Group on Warfarin Anticoagulation in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease in Sub-Saharan Africa
Individualized Administration of Warfarin by Polymorphisms of VKORC1 and CYP2C9 Genes:A Randomized Controlled Trial, Multi-center Trial
Association Between Risk Scores for Genetic Variants and Percentage of Time in Therapeutic Range for Participants With Atrial Fibrillation, Deep Vein Thrombosis, and/or Intracardiac Thrombosis Taking Warfarin
Who cites it
348 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review on the cost effectiveness of pharmacogenomics in developing countries: implementation challenges.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2022Pooled it
- Pharmacogenetic interventions to improve outcomes in patients with multimorbidity or prescribed polypharmacy: a systematic review.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2022Pooled it
- Genomewide association analysis of warfarin dose requirements in Middle Eastern and North African populations.Clinical and translational science · 2022Pooled it
- Warfarin dosing algorithms: A systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic review of the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics-guided treatment for cardiovascular diseases.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety of warfarin care bundles and novel oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2020Pooled it
- Impact of SLCO1B1 Pharmacogenetic Testing on Patient and Healthcare Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2019Pooled it
- Effect of CYP4F2, VKORC1, and CYP2C9 in Influencing Coumarin Dose: A Single-Patient Data Meta-Analysis in More Than 15,000 Individuals.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2019Pooled it
- Genotype-guided warfarin dosing vs. conventional dosing strategies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Pooled it
- Interventions and Strategies to Improve Oral Anticoagulant Use in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.Clinical drug investigation · 2018Pooled it
- Are Evidence Standards Different for Genomic- vs. Clinical-Based Precision Medicine? A Quantitative Analysis of Individualized Warfarin Therapy.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2017Pooled it
- Worldwide Distribution of Cytochrome P450 Alleles: A Meta-analysis of Population-scale Sequencing Projects.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2017Pooled it
- Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for Pharmacogenetics-Guided Warfarin Dosing: 2017 Update.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2017Guideline
- Subgroup analysis of genotype guided vs traditional warfarin dosing in Asian patients from an open label randomized trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Application of Loading Dose Warfarin in Postpartum Women with Pulmonary Embolism - a Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Pharmacogenetic guided versus standard warfarin dosing for routine clinical care with its pharmacoeconomic impact: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Annals of hematology · 2024Trial
- CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotyping for the quality of long-standing warfarin treatment in Russian patients.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2020Trial
- Genotype-Guided Dosing of Warfarin in Chinese Adults: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2020Trial
- Warfarin loading dose guided by pharmacogenetics is effective and safe in cardioembolic stroke patients - a randomized, prospective study.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2019Trial
- Trial
288 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe level of anticoagulation in response to a fixed-dose regimen of warfarin is difficult to predict during the initiation of therapy. We prospectively compared the effect of genotype-guided dosing with that of standard dosing on anticoagulation control in patients starting warfarin therapy.
methodsWe conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial involving patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism. Genotyping for CYP2C9*2, CYP2C9*3, and VKORC1 (-1639G→A) was performed with the use of a point-of-care test. For patients assigned to the genotype-guided group, warfarin doses were prescribed according to pharmacogenetic-based algorithms for the first 5 days. Patients in the control (standard dosing) group received a 3-day loading-dose regimen. After the initiation period, the treatment of all patients was managed according to routine clinical practice. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of time in the therapeutic range of 2.0 to 3.0 for the international normalized ratio (INR) during the first 12 weeks after warfarin initiation.
resultsA total of 455 patients were recruited, with 227 randomly assigned to the genotype-guided group and 228 assigned to the control group. The mean percentage of time in the therapeutic range was 67.4% in the genotype-guided group as compared with 60.3% in the control group (adjusted difference, 7.0 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 3.3 to 10.6; P<0.001). There were significantly fewer incidences of excessive anticoagulation (INR ≥4.0) in the genotype-guided group. The median time to reach a therapeutic INR was 21 days in the genotype-guided group as compared with 29 days in the control group (P<0.001).
conclusionsPharmacogenetic-based dosing was associated with a higher percentage of time in the therapeutic INR range than was standard dosing during the initiation of warfarin therapy. (Funded by the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01119300.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
24251363What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.