ArticleIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR2013
Optimal aminoglycoside therapy following the sepsis: how much is too much?
Article in Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The relation between inflammatory biomarkers and drug pharmacokinetics in the critically ill patients: a scoping review.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- Sepsis Stewardship: The Puzzle of Antibiotic Therapy in the Context of Individualization of Decision Making.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Potential Mechanisms Underlying Inflammation-Enhanced Aminoglycoside-Induced Cochleotoxicity.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2017Review
- Evaluation of aminoglycosides utilization in intensive care units of a teaching hospital in southern Iran.Pharmacy practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe sepsis and septic shock are major problems as the result of high rates morbidity and mortality in intensive care units (ICUs). In the presence of septic shock, each hour of delay in the administration of effective antibiotics is associated with a measurable increase in mortality. Aminoglycosides are effective broad-spectrum antibiotics that are commonly used in ICUs for the treatment of life-threatening Gram-negative infections and as a part of empiric therapy for severe sepsis and septic shock. Knowledge of the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of the antibiotics used for the management of critically ill patients is essential for selecting the antibiotic dosing regimens and improving patient outcome. Volume of distribution (Vd) and clearance (CL) of aminoglycosides in critically ill patients differs from general population and these parameters change considerably during the therapy. Pathophysiological changes during the sepsis alter the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of many drugs (increase in Vd and variable changes in CL have been reported for aminoglycosides during the sepsis), therefore, dosing regimen optimization is necessary for achieving therapeutic goal, and critically ill patients should receive larger loading doses of aminoglycosides in order to achieve therapeutic blood levels and due to the considerable variation in kinetic parameters, the use of standard doses of aminoglycosides or dosing nomograms is not recommended in these populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24250599PMC3813230W1929043992What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.