Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24250327›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2013

Patients' knowledge and perceived reactions to medical errors in a tertiary health facility in Nigeria.

B A Ushie, K K Salami, A S Jegede, M Oyetunde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Obligation towards medical errors disclosure at a tertiary care hospital in Dubai, UAE.The International journal of risk & safety in medicine · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

B A UshieInstitute of Child Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan Nigeria.
K K Salami
A S Jegede
M Oyetunde

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman errors in healthcare delivery pose serious threats to patients undergoing treatment. While clinical concern is growing in response, there is need to report social and behavioural context of the problem in Nigeria.

objectiveTo examine patients' knowledge and perceived reactions to medical errors.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted using a semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect data from 269 in-patients and 10 In-Depth Interviews were conducted among health caregivers in the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

resultsMajority (64.5%) of respondents reported annoyance and disappointment with medical errors. Severity of error (88.5%) and the perception of negligence mediated intention to litigate. Voluntary disclosure significantly reduced patients' intention to litigate caregivers (chi(2)=3.584; df=1; P=0.053). Frustration/anger was not more likely to influence patient to litigate than feelings of resignation/forgiveness (chi(2)=2.156; df=1; P>.05). Financial difficulties arising from error had an important influence on litigation. Health caregivers admitted possibility of errors; and insisted that although notifying patients/relatives about errors is appropriate, disclosure was dependent on the seriousness, health implications and the causes.

conclusionVoluntary disclosure and teamwork is very important in dealing with medical error. The role of medical social workers could be important in the discourse and disclosure of medical error.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMedical ErrorsAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitals, TeachingHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedNigeriaQualitative ResearchHealthcare deliveryMalpractice litigationMedical errorsNegligenceNigeriaVoluntary disclosure

Identifiers

PMID24250327
PMCPMC3824428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.