Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24249694›Full record

SynthesisArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2014

Definitions of extubation success in very premature infants: a systematic review.

Annie Giaccone, Erik Jensen, Peter Davis, Barbara Schmidt

Abstract readSystematic ReviewValidation Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Predictors of successful extubation from volume-targeted ventilation in extremely preterm neonates.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prediction of extubation failure among low birthweight neonates using machine learning.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Predictive factors for extubation success in very low and extremely low birth weight preterm infants.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2023
    Article
  20. Evaluation and validation of a prediction model for extubation success in very preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Annie GiacconeDivision of Neonatology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania, , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Erik Jensen
Peter Davis
Barbara Schmidt

Funding

Pediatric Hospital Epidemiology and Outcomes Research Training ProgramT32HD060550 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Christopher Peter Bonafide, John Chris Feudtner · 2010 to 2026
$6.8M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD060550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveStudies of extubation in preterm infants often define extubation success as a lack of reintubation within a specified time window. However, the duration of observation that defines extubation success in preterm infants has not been validated. The purpose of this study was to systematically review published definitions of extubation success in very preterm infants and to analyse the effect of the definition of extubation success on the reported rates of reintubation.

designStudies including very preterm infants published between 1 January 2002 and 30 June 2012 that reported reintubation as an outcome were reviewed for definitions of extubation success. Stepwise multivariable linear regression was used to explore variables associated with rate of reintubation.

resultsTwo independent reviewers performed the search with excellent agreement (κ=0.93). Of the 44 eligible studies, 31 defined a window of observation that ranged from 12 to 168 h (7 days). Extubation and reintubation criteria were highly variable. The mean±SD reintubation rate across all studies was 25±9%. In studies of infants with median birth weight (BW) ≤1000 g, reintubation rates steadily increased as the window of observation increased, without apparent plateau (p = 0.001). This trend was not observed in studies of larger infants (p = 0.85).

conclusionsVariability in the reported definitions of extubation success makes it difficult to compare extubation strategies across studies. The appropriate window of observation following extubation may depend on the population. In infants with BW ≤1000 g, even a week of observation may fail to identify some who will require reintubation.

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationClinical Trials as TopicHumansInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesIntensive Care Units, NeonatalIntubation, IntratrachealMultivariate AnalysisResearch DesignTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVentilator WeaningIntensive CareNeonatologyRespiratory

Identifiers

PMID24249694
PMCPMC4025952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.