ArticleSurgery today2014
Inguinal hernia repair with the mesh plug method is safe after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Article in Surgery today, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Asymptomatic plug erosion into the sigmoid colon after mesh plug hernia repair: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Correlation between the incidence of inguinal hernia and risk factors after radical prostatic cancer surgery: a case control study.BMC urology · 2024Article
- Totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair during extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Report of a case.International journal of surgery case reports · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe evaluated the safety and efficiency of using the mesh plug method (MP) to repair inguinal hernias in patients with a history of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). We also investigated how RRP influences the development of inguinal hernias and impacts their repair.
methodsAmong 488 adult male patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair during a recent 5-year period, 37 had a history of RRP. We compared the characteristics and surgical outcomes of the patients who had undergone RRP (post-RRP group) with those who had not (non-RRP group).
resultsAll post-RRP hernias were treated by MP. The 37 post-RRP patients had a collective 41 hernias, 40 of which were of the indirect type. The side affected by the hernia did not differ significantly between the groups. We compared the short-term surgical outcomes of the indirect post-RRP hernias vs. the indirect non-RPP hernias without recurrence and incarceration. The operation times, postoperative hospital stay, and mobility rates did not differ significantly between the two groups. The blood loss was almost equal in both groups.
conclusionInguinal hernia repair after RRP may be difficult because of inflammatory changes in the preperitoneal cavity, but the surgical outcomes of MP were equivalent in patients with or without a history of RPP in this study. MP is a safe and effective method for post-RPP hernia repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.