Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24249641›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2014

Hybrid microPET imaging for dosimetric applications in mice: improvement of activity quantification in dynamic microPET imaging for accelerated dosimetry applied to 6-[18 F]fluoro-L-DOPA and 2-[18 F]fluoro-L-tyrosine.

F Bretin, T Mauxion, G Warnock, M A Bahri, L Libert, C Lemaire, A Luxen, M Bardiès, A Seret, A Plenevaux

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Internal radiation dosimetry of aEJNMMI research · 2019
    Article
  3. Radiation dosimetry of the αEJNMMI physics · 2016
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

F BretinCyclotron Research Centre, University of Liege, Allée du 6 Août, Building B30, Sart Tilman, 4000, Liege, Belgium.
T Mauxion
G Warnock
M A Bahri
L Libert
C Lemaire
A Luxen
M Bardiès
A Seret
A Plenevaux

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDynamic microPET imaging has advantages over traditional organ harvesting, but is prone to quantification errors in small volumes. Hybrid imaging, where microPET activities are cross-calibrated using post scan harvested organs, can improve quantification. Organ harvesting, dynamic imaging and hybrid imaging were applied to determine the human and mouse radiation dosimetry of 6-[18 F]fluoro-L-DOPA and 2-[18 F]fluoro-L-tyrosine and compared. PROCEDURES: Two-hour dynamic microPET imaging was performed with both tracers in four separate mice for 18 F-FDOPA and three mice for 18 F-FTYR. Organ harvesting was performed at 2, 5, 10, 30, 60 and 120 min post tracer injection with n = 5 at each time point for 18 F-FDOPA and n = 3 at each time point for 18 F-FTYR. Human radiation dosimetry projected from animal data was calculated for the three different approaches for each tracer using OLINDA/EXM. S-factors for the MOBY phantom were used to calculate the animal dosimetry.

resultsCorrelations between dose estimates based on organ harvesting and imaging was improved from r = 0.997 to r = 0.999 for 18 F-FDOPA and from r = 0.985 to r = 0.996 (p < 0.0001 for all) for 18 F-FTYR by using hybrid imaging.

conclusionHybrid imaging yields comparable results to traditional organ harvesting while partially overcoming the limitations of pure imaging. It is an advantageous technique in terms of number of animals needed and labour involved.

Indexed as

AnimalsDihydroxyphenylalanineFluorine RadioisotopesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPositron-Emission TomographyTissue DistributionTyrosineDihydroxyphenylalanineFluorine RadioisotopesTyrosine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.