Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24249593›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physical anthropology2013

Genomics, the origins of agriculture, and our changing microbe-scape: time to revisit some old tales and tell some new ones.

Kristin N Harper, George J Armelagos

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physical anthropology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Imperative to Vaccinate.The Journal of pediatrics · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bioinformatics in Africa: The Rise of Ghana?PLoS computational biology · 2015
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin N HarperDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032.
George J Armelagos
Columbia University · USEmory University · US

Funding

Training Program in Cancer-Related Population SciencesR25CA094061 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NEUGUT, ALFRED I. · 2002 to 2016
$5.9M
Training Program in Cancer-related Population SciencesT32CA094061 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NEUGUT, ALFRED I., TERRY, MARY BETH · 2017 to 2021
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA094061NCI NIH HHS R25-CA 094061NCI NIH HHS T32 CA094061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Though agriculture is often viewed as one of humanity's crowning achievements, skeletal evidence indicates that dependence on domesticated plants and animals was accompanied by an increase in infectious disease. Scientists have proposed that many important infections emerged in the period following the advent of agriculture, as a result of newly dense populations and novel proximity to domestic animals that served as reservoirs for novel pathogens. Here, we review genomic evidence regarding pathogen origins, analyzing these data using the epidemiological transition framework. Genetic information has forced us to reconsider how and when many important pathogens emerged; it appears that a number of infections thought to result from contact with domesticated animals arose much earlier than agriculture was adopted. We also consider the broader effect of agriculture upon the microbiome, exploring potential consequences for human health. We end by discussing the changes in the human microbe-scape we are likely to see in the future.

Indexed as

AgricultureGenomicsMicrobiotaAnimalsAnimals, DomesticAnthropology, PhysicalDiseaseHumansdomesticationepidemiological transitionevolutiongeneticsmicrobiomepathogens

Identifiers

PMID24249593
PMCPMC7159788
OpenAlexW1547530048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.