Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24249536›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2014

A model to predict limb salvage in severe combat-related open calcaneus fractures.

Adam J Bevevino, Jonathan F Dickens, Benjamin K Potter, Theodora Dworak, Wade Gordon, Jonathan A Forsberg

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Combat amputee care for Global War on Terror Veterans: A systematic review.Journal of military, veteran and family health · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Machine learning in orthopaedic surgery.World journal of orthopedics · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinical efficacy and prognosis factors of open calcaneal fracture: a retrospective study.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Adam J BevevinoRegenerative Medicine Department, Naval Medical Research Center, 503 Robert Grant Avenue, Silver Spring, MD, 20910, USA.
Jonathan F Dickens
Benjamin K Potter
Theodora Dworak
Wade Gordon
Jonathan A Forsberg
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center · USKarolinska Institutet · SENaval Medical Research Command · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpen calcaneus fractures can be limb threatening and almost universally result in some measure of long-term disability. A major goal of initial management in patients with these injuries is setting appropriate expectations and discussing the likelihood of limb salvage, yet there are few tools that assist in predicting the outcome of this difficult fracture pattern. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We developed two decision support tools, an artificial neural network and a logistic regression model, based on presenting data from severe combat-related open calcaneus fractures. We then determined which model more accurately estimated the likelihood of amputation and which was better suited for clinical use.

methodsInjury-specific data were collected from wounded active-duty service members who sustained combat-related open calcaneus fractures between 2003 and 2012. One-hundred fifty-five open calcaneus fractures met inclusion criteria. Median followup was 3.5 years (interquartile range: 1.5, 5.1 years), and amputation rate was 44%. We developed an artificial neural network designed to estimate the likelihood of amputation, using information available on presentation. For comparison, a conventional logistic regression model was developed with variables identified on univariate analysis. We determined which model more accurately estimated the likelihood of amputation using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Decision curve analysis was then performed to determine each model's clinical utility.

resultsAn artificial neural network that contained eight presenting features resulted in smaller error. The eight features that contributed to the most predictive model were American Society of Anesthesiologist grade, plantar sensation, fracture treatment before arrival, Gustilo-Anderson fracture type, Sanders fracture classification, vascular injury, male sex, and dismounted blast mechanism. The artificial neural network was 30% more accurate, with an area under the curve of 0.8 (compared to 0.65 for logistic regression). Decision curve analysis indicated the artificial neural network resulted in higher benefit across the broadest range of threshold probabilities compared to the logistic regression model and is perhaps better suited for clinical use.

conclusionsThis report demonstrates an artificial neural network was capable of accurately estimating the likelihood of amputation. Furthermore, decision curve analysis suggested the artificial neural network is better suited for clinical use than logistic regression. Once properly validated, this may provide a tool for surgeons and patients faced with combat-related open calcaneus fractures in which decisions between limb salvage and amputation remain difficult.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesLimb SalvageMilitary MedicineMilitary PersonnelAdultAmputation, SurgicalCalcaneusFemaleFoot InjuriesFracture FixationFracture HealingFractures, BoneHumansLikelihood FunctionsLogistic ModelsMale

Identifiers

PMID24249536
PMCPMC4160503
OpenAlexW2080615475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.