ReviewDer Orthopade2014
[Complications after osteosynthetic treatment of acetabular fractures].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of permissive weight bearing in surgically treated trauma patients with peri- and intra-articular fractures of the lower extremities: a prospective comparative multicenter cohort study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Trial
- Quadrilateral plate classification program of acetabular fractures based on three-column classification: a three-dimensional fracture mapping study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Digital anatomical study and clinical application of screw placement for quadrilateral plate fractures in the danger zone.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2020Article
- Permissive weight bearing in trauma patients with fracture of the lower extremities: prospective multicenter comparative cohort study.BMC surgery · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The early work of Judet and Letournel in the 1970s and 1980s led to a paradigm shift in the treatment of acetabular fractures. The previously purely conservative treatment was replaced more and more by open surgical approaches. The complex, three-dimensional bony anatomy and the periacetabular soft tissue with a close topographic relationship to intrapelvic and extrapelvic neurovascular and visceral structures implicate an increased rate as well as a high risk for intraoperative and postoperative complications. Simultaneously, anatomical reconstruction with a gap step-off less than 1-2 mm is required. Fractures of the acetabulum are comparatively rare and only few trauma centers have the capability and the infrastructure to treat acetabular fractures. Therefore, the aim of this review was to illustrate the possible intraoperative and postoperative complications of osteosynthetic treatment of acetabular fractures as well as to identify possible strategies for treatment and prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.