Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24248373›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013

Reintroducing domesticated wild mice to sociality induces adaptive transgenerational effects on MUP expression.

Adam C Nelson, Joseph W Cauceglia, Seth D Merkley, Neil A Youngson, Andrew J Oler, Randy J Nelson, Bradley R Cairns, Emma Whitelaw, Wayne K Potts

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Infection ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Infection withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Epigenetic Manipulation of Psychiatric Behavioral Disorders Induced byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Adam C NelsonDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
Joseph W Cauceglia
Seth D Merkley
Neil A Youngson
Andrew J Oler
Randy J Nelson
Bradley R Cairns
Emma Whitelaw
Wayne K Potts
University of Utah · USLa Trobe University · AUThe Ohio State University · USUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM007464 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GRUNWALD, DAVID J., STANFIELD, GILLIAN · 1985 to 2020
$6.1M
SELECTIVE MECHANISMS MAINTAINING H-2 POLYMORPHISMSR01GM039578 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI POTTS, WAYNE K. · 1989 to 2007
$2.0M
The role of sex in the evolution and spread of virulent infectious diseaseR01GM109500 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ADLER, FREDERICK R., POTTS, WAYNE K. · 2013 to 2016
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM039578NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM039578NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109500NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM109500NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When brought into captivity, wild animals can adapt to domestication within 10 generations. Such adaptations may decrease fitness in natural conditions. Many selective pressures are disrupted in captivity, including social behavioral networks. Although lack of sociality in captivity appears to mediate domestication, the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Additionally, determining the contribution of genetic inheritance vs. transgenerational effects during relaxed selection may provide insight into the flexibility of adaptation. When wild-derived mice kept under laboratory conditions for eight generations were reintroduced to sociality and promiscuity (free mate choice), they adapted within two generations. Fitness assessments between this promiscuous lineage and a monogamous laboratory lineage revealed male-specific effects. Promiscuous-line males had deficits in viability, but a striking advantage in attracting mates, and their scent marks were also more attractive to females. Here, we investigate mechanistic details underlying this olfactory signal and identify a role of major urinary protein (MUP) pheromones. Promiscuous-line males inherit higher MUP expression than monogamous-line males through transgenerational inheritance. Sociality-driven maternal and paternal effects reveal intriguing conflicts among parents and offspring over pheromone expression. MUP up-regulation is not driven by hormone-driven transduction pathways, but rather is associated with reduction in DNA methylation of a CpG dinucleotide in the promoter. This reduction in methylation could enhance transcription by promoting the binding of transcription factor USF1 (upstream stimulatory factor 1). Finally, we experimentally demonstrate that increased MUP expression is a female attractant. These results identify molecular mechanisms guiding domestication and adaptive responses to fluctuating sociality.

Indexed as

Social EnvironmentAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryChromatin ImmunoprecipitationEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleMaleMaternal ExposureMating Preference, AnimalMiceProteinsRadioimmunoassayTestosteronemajor urinary proteinsProteinsTestosteroneepigeneticssexy sonssocial selection

Identifiers

PMID24248373
PMCPMC3856842
OpenAlexW1986608538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.