Observational studyPediatric cardiology2014
Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in critically ill children with cardiac disease.
Observational study in Pediatric cardiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recommendations for mechanical ventilation of critically ill children from the Paediatric Mechanical Ventilation Consensus Conference (PEMVECC).Intensive care medicine · 2017Guideline
- Clinical Profile and Outcome of Children Requiring Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV).Indian journal of pediatrics · 2022Observational
- Feasibility of Pediatric Non-Invasive Respiratory Support in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Indian pediatrics · 2021Review
- Epidemiology of Noninvasive Ventilation in Pediatric Cardiac ICUs.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2017Observational
- Spectrum and outcome of the use of noninvasive ventilation in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit: A single-center experience.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Noninvasive ventilation is effective in respiratory failure from various etiologies. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in pediatric cardiac patients. NPPV was used (1) as an alternative means of respiratory support in patients with hypoxemic or hypercarbic respiratory failure or with signs of respiratory distress that were considered to require intubation; or (2) as a preventive measure in patients with high risk for extubation failure. Between 2008 and 2011, there were 107 episodes of NPPV use in 82 patients. Their median age was 57 days (range 1 day to 18 years), and weight was 4.1 kg (range 1.7-68). Within the first hour of NPPV, partial pressure of carbon dioxide/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) was significantly increased, and arterial pCO2, and respiratory rate were decreased. This decrease in respiratory rate and increase in PaO 2/FiO2 continued during the first 24 h of therapy, and pCO2 was decreased during the first 6 h. In 59.8% of cases, NPPV was successfully used without the need for tracheal intubation. The Aristotle Basic Complexity score, presence of infection, residual cardiac defect, and pH <7.36 in the first hour were independent predictors of NPPV failure. We conclude that NPPV improved oxygenation and decreased respiratory effort in pediatric cardiac patients, 59.8% of whom eventually did not receive intubation. A high-complexity surgical score, presence of infection, residual cardiac defect, and pH <7.36 in the first hour are predictors of NPPV failure, which occurs in most patients >24 h after the onset of therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.