ArticleJAMA internal medicine2014
Rapid increase in breast magnetic resonance imaging use: trends from 2000 to 2011.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The effect of pre-operative MRI on the in-breast tumor recurrence rate of patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical treatment for breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2017Pooled it
- Establishing an Evidence-based Modern Breast MRI Program.Journal of breast imaging · 2026Review
- An interpretable AI system reduces false-positive MRI diagnoses by stratifying high-risk breast lesions.Nature communications · 2026Article
- ASO Author Reflections: The Impact of Breast MRI on Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Diagnosis and Management.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Trends in Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Diagnosis and Upgrade: A 20-Year Experience and Impact of MRI Use on Upgrade Rates.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Scheduling an appointment for MRI: patient perception of wait time and difficulty.Israel journal of health policy research · 2025Article
- Breast Cancer MRI Screening of Patients After Multiplex Gene Panel Testing.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- A Multi-institutional Analysis of Factors Influencing the Rate of Positive MRI Biopsy Among Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Characteristics associated with healthcare disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic for women in the United States at high risk for breast cancer.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Article
- Risk of Lobular Neoplasia Upgrade with Synchronous Carcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Downstream Mammary and Extramammary Cascade Services and Spending Following Screening Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs Mammography Among Commercially Insured Women.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Article
- Trends in screening breast magnetic resonance imaging use among US women, 2006 to 2016.Cancer · 2020Observational
- Patterns of Breast Imaging Use Among Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Article
- Association of Retrospective Peer Review and Positive Predictive Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Needle Biopsies of Breast.European journal of breast health · 2019Article
- Measuring Tumor Extent Based on Subtypes Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Radiologic-Pathologic Discordance and High Positive Margin Rates in Breast Cancer.Journal of breast cancer · 2019Article
- Contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2019Review
- The effect of local therapy on breast cancer-specific mortality of women with occult breast cancer and advanced nodal disease (N2/N3): a population analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceBreast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly sensitive for detecting breast cancer. Low specificity, cost, and little evidence regarding mortality benefits, however, limit recommendations for its use to high-risk women. How breast MRI is actually used in community settings is unknown.
objectiveTo describe breast MRI trends and indications in a community setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsRetrospective cohort study at a not-for-profit health plan and multispecialty group medical practice in New England of 10,518 women aged 20 years and older enrolled in the health plan for at least 1 year who had at least 1 breast MRI between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2011. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Breast MRI counts were obtained from claims data. Clinical indication (screening, diagnostic evaluation, staging or treatment, or surveillance) was determined using a prediction model developed from electronic medical records on a subset of participants. Breast cancer risk status was assessed using claims data and, for the subset, also through electronic medical record review. RESULTS; Breast MRI use increased more than 20-fold from 6.5 per 10,000 women in 2000 to 130.7 per 10,000 in 2009. Use then declined and stabilized to 104.8 per 10,000 by 2011. Screening and surveillance, rare indications in 2000, together accounted for 57.6% of MRI use by 2011; 30.1% had a claims-documented personal history and 51.7% a family history of breast cancer, whereas 3.5% of women had a documented genetic mutation. In the subset of women with electronic medical records who received screening or surveillance MRIs, only 21.0% had evidence of meeting American Cancer Society (ACS) criteria for breast MRI. Conversely, only 48.4% of women with documented deleterious genetic mutations received breast MRI screening. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Breast MRI use increased steeply over 10 years and then stabilized, especially for screening and surveillance among women with family or personal history of breast cancer; most women receiving screening and surveillance breast MRIs lacked documented evidence of meeting ACS criteria, and many women with mutations were not screened. Efforts are needed to ensure that breast MRI use and documentation are focused on those women who will benefit most.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.